THISDAY

America’s White Skin in Black Masks

- Dr. Jamin Ohwovoriol­e Twitter handle: @jariole

Ihad a conversati­on with Frantz Fanon last night. And, nope, we did not discuss the vexing issues of the wretched of the earth. Instead, it was the exfoliatin­g impact of the contact between civilizati­ons as enunciated in black skin, white masks that was the crux of our discourse. And, guess what: Fanon rolled on the floor laughing all night long gasping for air between burst of laughter and a phrase that seems to choke him: “… a restructur­ing of the world.”

My encounter with Fanon was necessitat­ed by the dreary act of Rachel Dolezal, who probably broke the internet a few days ago after her white, proudly American, parents with European roots declared her a fraud. This denigratin­g label was affixed on Rachel Dolezal with aplomb and gusto when her parents, a few days ago, revealed that their daughter is without any iota of blackness in her lineage: in other words, Rachel Dolezal is hundred per cent Caucasian! Since then, there has been an avalanche of diatribe on social media platforms castigatin­g this professor of Africana Studies who, for so many years, has been parading herself as the progeny of an inter racial union. In essence, this lady, who until a few days ago was the Spokane chapter president of the powerful National Associatio­n for the Advancemen­t of Coloured People (NAACP), is another exotic quantum invading the American political landscape just like Barack Obama did a few years ago. For me, her actions are not disturbing because, as Fanon reminded me last night, “man is motion toward the world and toward his like.” However, what I find appalling is the insolence of the American society towards Rachel Dolezal. Therefore, it is the American hypocrisy that fills me up with nausea.

If Americans were not hypocritic­al, no one would have cast the first stone at Rachel Dolezal. Why do I say this? It is because every true American citizen knows that the US is the land of the free and home of the brave! This declaratio­n is not just an empty boast that finds relevance only as the last line of the American national anthem, but it is the very essence of the American way of life which is always defended, with the US military might as the trusted bulwark. Therefore, the braveness of Rachel Dolezal in wearing black masks on her white skin should be celebrated because her action epitomizes the liberty that is American. Besides, why should she be vilified and crucified by mortals if Amendment 14 to the US constituti­on stipulates that no state can even deprive any person of liberty “without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdicti­on the equal protection of the laws”? In my view, Rachel Dolezal’s rebellion against white privilege is not tantamount to an insurrecti­on against the state of Washington or the US as a sovereign state. As a result, since she has not committed a treason, no one American has been born to “abridge the privileges or immunities of” Rachel Dolezal; that is, according to the US constituti­on.

Hypocrisy aside, the Rachel Dolezal debacle and the attendant trolling focusing on her actions depict a bulk of Americans as ignorant people who are oblivious of the provisions of the Universal Declaratio­n of Human Rights. If Rachel Dolezal, within the provisions of the US constituti­on, is simply exercising her freedom to become physically a black woman in spite of her natural whiteness just as a well endowed masculine Olympian, Bruce Jenner, recently metamorpho­sed into Caitlyn Jenner, why should a vivacious white lady with an astute faculty become disparaged here in America simply because she chose to wear black masks? As far as I am concerned, there is no basis for the recriminat­ion because, according to Article 27 of the UN Universal Declaratio­n of Human Rights, “everyone has the right freely to participat­e in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancemen­t and its benefits.” This provision, without any doubt in my mind, encapsulat­es the provisions in Article 18 and 19 that affirm that everyone “has the right to freedom of thought ... [and] right to freedom of expression.” Consequent­ly, it is the prerogativ­e of Rachel Dolezal, without any interferen­ce, to think that she is a black person trapped in a white skin and it is her right to participat­e, without any hindrance, in the cultural life of the black community. After all, just as Fanon quipped, doesn’t “white and black represent the two poles of a world, two poles in perpetual conflict”?

Another nature of the American public, which I find worrisome, is the unwarrante­d display of self-righteousn­ess by those whose hearts may be described as the devil’s playground or else why should a tolerant, God fearing people always rush to judgment and fan the ambers of destructio­n at every given opportunit­y without taking into considerat­ion the rights of other people? Here is the truth: America has always benefitted from its performanc­e of blackness just as its national interest defines her foreign policies, and Americans of all ages know it. So, there is no justificat­ion for the recent hoopla because some random white lady chose to model her life after what is permissibl­e within black culture. My crystal ball tells me that her parents, just like Madonna and Angelina Jolie, gave Rachel Dolezal ample reason to long for what she lacked at birth. Or how will one explain the parents’ penchant for the adoption of black kids? I am not saying that the parents are guilty of a crime for adopting black children, but I am only suggesting that they provided the inspiratio­n for her unfettered embrace of her internal blackness since this may be the easiest way to explain her relationsh­ip with her four black siblings without being interrogat­ed by a discrimina­ting world. Within this context, Fanon interjecte­d: “The neurotic structure of an individual is simply the elaboratio­n, the formation, the eruption within the ego, of conflictua­l clusters arising in part out of the environmen­t and in part out of the purely personal way in which that individual reacts to these influences [of the environmen­t].

Rachel Dolezal may have awoken the world’s collective unconsciou­s through her actions, but the universe should remember her performanc­e as a harmless public declaratio­n: “I marry black culture, black beauty, black blackness.”

Frantz Fanon laughs at this parody.

 ??  ?? Rachel Dolezal
Rachel Dolezal
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria