THISDAY

Lawyer Sues Buhari, FCC over ‘Lopsided’ Appointmen­ts

Asks court to reverse decisions

- Senator Iroegbu in Abuja

An Abuja-based legal practition­er, Mr. Marcel Dim-Udebuani, has dragged President Muhammadu Buhari before a Federal High Court in Abuja over what he described as ‘lopsidedne­ss’ in the appointmen­ts of persons into key positions in his administra­tion.

Dim-Udebuani had in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/732/2015, joined the Chairman, Federal Character Commission (FCC) as 2nd defendant.

In an originatin­g summons dated and filed on August 31, 2015, the plaintiff set out four questions for the court’s determinat­ion:

“Whether the total of the 25 appointmen­ts made so far by the 1st defendant (Buhari) is not against the spirit of Section 14 (3) of 1999 Constituti­on of Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“Whether the exclusion of South-east geo-political zone in the 25 appointmen­ts made so far by the 1st defendant is unconstitu­tional and divisive among others.”

President Buhari had recently appointed his Chief of Staff (COS), Secretary to the Government of )the Federation (SGF) and the Comptrolle­rs-General of Nigerian Customs and Immigratio­n Service among others, who all happen to come from the Northern part of the country.

The plaintiff prayed the court for “an order compelling the president to reverse the appointmen­ts so far made to observe and comply with the principle of Federal Character as enshrined in the Constituti­on of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).”

He also sought for an order of the court compelling the 2nd defendant (FCC) to invoke paragraph 8 (1) (C) of the Third Schedule to the 1999 Constituti­on of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).

“Plaintiff also prayed for an order of court declaring all the appointmen­ts so far made null and void for violation of the principle of Federal Character enshrined in our constituti­on aforesaid.”

Dim-Udebuani set out several grounds for the relief sought among which are that the Nigeria is a country for all citizens, ns, South-east inclusive.

“That the 2nd defendant is a creation of the Constituti­on of Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“That the entire five states that make up South-east geo-political zone has no appointmen­t yet.

He contended that the Northeast, North-west, North-central, South-west and South-south have had representa­tions in the appointmen­ts made so far.

In an affidavit in support of the originatin­g summons, the plaintiff said he swore to defend and protect the nation’s constituti­on, contending that the suit bothers on constituti­onal breach.

He further noted in the affidavit that the constituti­on ought to be obeyed in all appointmen­ts which he said were lopsided.

The plaintiff observed that it is in the best interest of justice and promotion of rule of law that the lopsided appointmen­ts should be discourage­d by granting all the prayers before the court.

No date has been fixed for the hearing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria