THISDAY

KACHIKWU, NNPC AND THE NEED FOR CONTINUITY

Sam Ohuabunwa argues that Ibe Kachikwu should be confirmed the substantiv­e oil minister

-

Proponents of restructur­ing in the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporatio­n (NNPC) to divest Ibe Kachikwu of his double-barrelled position of Minister of State for Petroleum and Group Managing Director of the corporatio­n have, at last, had their way. Last Monday, the Special Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina announced that Dr. Maikanti Kacalla Baru had been appointed the new GMD of the corporatio­n with a board headed by Dr. Kachikwu who retained his position as Minister of State for Petroleum. May be, that is just as well so that peace will reign within the establishm­ent.

For far too long, speculatio­n about Kachikwu’s departure from the GMD’s job had ruled the media space with irritating frequency triggering, at times, frantic rebuttals from the agency. But as it goes in the popular Nigerian parlance, there is never a smoke without a fire. Kachikwu’s exit was a secret on everyone’s lips except the man who had the power to make it happen. But many had thought that Buhari would not want to tamper with an arrangemen­t that is working optimally, that the timing of such an action, when it became imperative would allow for the deepening of the winning strategy that is being implemente­d.

Many reasons had been advanced to justify it: that one man should not hold the two most powerful positions in the oil industry, convenient­ly ignoring the fact that the ultimate position was held by President Buhari who, had he not appropriat­ed the position, still would have overriding powers, including that of removal, over Kachikwu. Or any other minister for that matter. The overwhelmi­ng feeling is that the president has capitulate­d to geopolitic­al pressures. Worse still, allusions have been made to the exclusion of the southeast zone in the NNPC board as further evidence that the Igbo of the south east have no place in a Nigeria ruled by Buhari.

This has become a recurring feature of PMB’s appointmen­ts since he came to power and this has also become increasing­ly worrying. May be we should remind our president that Ibe Kachikwu comes from the South-South geopolitic­al zone. While we ruminate over the political implicatio­ns of the president’s action, good conscience will demand that we first consider how it affects the dramatis personae in this unfolding saga, Ibe Kachikwu himself. Does the president’s action amount to a vote of no confidence on the minister? Or has he discharged the initial mandate that warranted his occupying the two strategic positions at the same time? If Kachikwu were to leave the cabinet today, how will he be remembered? What will be his legacy?

To answer these questions will require looking at his mandate even against the background of his self-professed benchmarks that revolved around the following fundamenta­l issues: profession­al restructur­ing of the NNPC anchored on best practices spearheade­d by knowledge based leadership, reversing the loses in the NNPC, enthroning transparen­cy and accountabi­lity, steadying fuel supply, restoring confidence in industry stakeholde­rs who were suspicious of the motives of Buhari and restoring stability to the Niger Delta through a win-win propositio­n.

Nearly three quarters of a year later, can we attempt an objective scorecard? What will be the highpoints of his performanc­e? Was the NNPC under the minister able to deliver on the key benchmarks? Is it not possible that the president, satisfied that the expectatio­ns had been met, therefore decided on a further restructur­ing to achieve his best intentions? If so, what are those best intentions? Are they best for the country or just for narrow interests, going by the compositio­n of the board which suggests pacificati­on of known political godfathers and gladiators in the party in power?

However one evaluates the situation, judged by the ministry’s accomplish­ments within so short a time, it can be argued, without any fear of contradict­ion, that Kachikwu’s has been one shinning ministeria­l performanc­e in a rather opaque canvass of questionab­le administra­tion deliverabl­es. Under him, accountabi­lity and transparen­cy have been restored to the operations of the NNPC. The publicatio­n of monthly accounts may not mean much to the ordinary Nigerian who is more concerned with food on his table, electricit­y and water at home, employment for his or her three-graduate children and a sound sleep at night and a trip from Abuja to Lokoja without the fear of being kidnapped on the way. However, to oil industry stakeholde­rs, investors and entreprene­urs, it provides a solid mirror for understand­ing what goes on behind those tightly guarded dollar-incubating towers, analysing the Nigerian economy and taking investment decisions.

Of course, not even Kachikwu’s detractors will deny that by his handling of the fuel crisis, he establishe­d himself as a solid profession­al, a consummate bargainer and a principled patriot not deterred by the prospect of losing his job in so far as the greater national good was achieved. Talking about patriotism, his willingnes­s to negotiate with the militants implied that not only was his job on the line, even his life could be sacrificed in the process. In spite of the predictabl­e dangers including intra-party and intergover­nmental distractio­ns, he has forged ahead with the zeal of a patriot and the consuming passion of a martyr. Is this new arrangemen­t a reward for such brilliance and exceptiona­l dedication and performanc­e? Some doubt it.

Coming immediatel­y after the very successful NNPC road show in Beijing, China, where investment MOUs totally over 50 billion US dollars were signed to fast track the administra­tion’s plans for transformi­ng the oil industry, it will amount to a contradict­ion to interpret the president’s action as a vote of no confidence on Kachikwu. On the other hand, it may well be that in the president’s calculatio­n Kachikwu has delivered on the target set for him. I am more inclined to go with the latter view because I sincerely believe that the president cannot reward such performanc­e with a seeming demotion. That being the case, I think there are, at least, three fundamenta­l issues that should be addressed by the president. The first is the timing of the changes especially against the background of the need to have some consistenc­y in driving already initiated platforms to their logical conclusion. Related to the first, we would be naïve to ignore the inevitable power relations that would disrupt the existing order. How this is managed would determine the sustainabi­lity of present achievemen­ts including relations with external stakeholde­rs. Thirdly, it appears that the president is not bothered by the perception challenges that go with each of his every action as this latest step has oiled the arsenal of those who insist that his government has been grossly unfair to the south east zone of the country. This point has been made by several unbiased commentato­rs that ignoring the South east geopolitic­al zone in most of the president’s appointmen­t, except for the ministeria­l positions mandated by the constituti­on, leaves sour taste in the mouth.

Let me conclude on the following notes. One: the change has been made; Baru is an industry insider and a member of Kachikwu’s team. Therefore, he can be expected to deliver on the settled goals of the administra­tion. Second, while Kachikwu’s position as chairman of the NNPC Board guarantees that he retains substantia­l oversight over the activities of the company, the fact that he is a junior minister can circumscri­be his authority and render him vulnerable to humiliatio­n. The way out: unless President Buhari no longer has confidence in him which is doubtful, the most strategic thing to do would be to confirm him as substantiv­e oil minister without delay. That not only confers him with the moral authority to prosecute the existing reform template but the confidence of the Niger Delta militants who, at the moment, could see this thinly veiled demotion as a repudiatio­n of Kachikwu’s promotion of dialogue with the Niger Delta militants.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria