THISDAY

The Economy and You: Tales of the Unexpected

- Anya Anya -Professor O. Anya is former chief executive officer, Nigeria Economic Summit Group (See Concluding part on www.thisdayliv­e.com)

Acursory glance at the Nigerian print media as well as the social media paints a gloomy picture of the state of both the Nigerian society and economy. Apart from the insurgency in the North East and the upsurge in attacks on oil/gas installati­ons in Niger Delta by the militants there is an explosive increase in such social maladies as mindless murders, kidnapping, rape, arson and the marauding Fulani herdsmen in the South and North Central geopolitic­al zones. It is as if Nigeria is on the verge of an undeclared war. These social maladies have been there over the last several years admittedly at a much lower intensity but now it is as if it has now reached an inexplicab­le crescendo. It is therefore not surprising that the economy is in dire straits. Naturally we are forced to ask why and particular­ly why at this point in time?

The State of the Economy: 2014 vs 2016:

If we cast our minds back as recently as 2014, there was literally an upbeat tone to discussion­s on the state of the Nigerian economy. The GDP calculatio­ns had been rebased, conferring on us the status of the largest economy in Africa ahead of South Africa and Egypt. On the internatio­nal scene, Nigeria had consistent­ly posted a GDP p.a. rate of over 7% for the previous 3-5 years and although this had dropped, it was still impressive at more than 6%. What is more Nigeria was touted as one of the preferred destinatio­ns for Direct Foreign investment (DFI) and was regarded as one of the emerging markets that was poised to break through to sustainabl­e high growth rate. Corruption was mentioned as a problem but the outlook was neverthele­ss positive.

Unemployme­nt especially of the youth was unacceptab­ly high but not as high as the current situation indicates. So the question is why the economy seems to have unraveled and regressed in less than one year of the new administra­tion? The reason is simple although not so obvious even to the unprepared economist.

The fundamenta­l driver of economic activities is human behaviour. The economic data that we use to gauge the state of the economy are mere aggregatio­ns of patterns of human economic behaviour. When the patterns of behaviour indicates a positive feedback the individual responds in an optimistic frame of mind. This is so because human behaviour responds to incentives, rewards and sanctions. Responses to each of these different stimuli produce different outcomes that will be summed up as economic trends in one direction or another. Hence when the narrative on the Nigerian economy suddenly tended to emphasize elements of unsavoury news, the new situation bred a new climate of uncertaint­y, fear and doubt. This incipient environmen­t of uncertaint­y and fear was amplified and garnished with a dose of well-honed propaganda, often propagated with flourish. The harvest is what we have seen in the cautious approach to normal life which we find in the market place. It is not for nothing, that the “feel good” attitude is a necessary companion to good economic environmen­ts. This is not to say that the negative and unacceptab­le behaviour that have been exposed in the recent past can ever be acceptable. What is critical is how we do handle the situation. The natural human tendency is to expect the necessary ameliorati­ve programme that is rational, fair, just and reformist. When our response stops at denunciati­on alone shorn of these other actions that will rebuild and inform in a manner consistent with a hopeful future, the alternativ­e is confusion in the social psyche – the harbinger of a problemati­c economy. Even in the direst of situations, the citizenry expect a plan of action beyond the trading of blames. Economies operate through signals and the responses to those signals. Hence we need a new repertoire of signals to deal with the new climate of uncertaint­y, fear and doubt. To tackle the current problems we need to know where we are coming from and how the current problems emerged. So we need not only a short term view of our own problems and their solutions but also a long term view of the strategies that are needed to take us to the more desirable destinatio­n of our hopes.

Where we are coming from

It has been said that the welfare of the citizenry is the primary goal of governance. In the pursuit of that end, our founding fathers opted for a federal system of governance in recognitio­n of the plural nature of our society. Then came the military interventi­on and interregnu­m. This imposed on us a more centralize­d government without accountabi­lity to civil society and which often lacked transparen­cy. What is more the checks and balances which the legislatur­e confers on the system was abrogated. Thus the governance system imposed by the military lacked moral legitimacy and thus bred institutio­nal instabilit­y. Not surprising­ly, the command structure of the military imitated in governance led to the privatizat­ion of the state with patrimonia­l incentives and bureaucrat­ic management. Clientilis­m usurped the moral and political legitimacy where political and personal loyalties are rewarded more than merit. Hard work did not count anymore as the basis for rewards in the system.

This situation understand­ably transforme­d the environmen­t and dynamics for developmen­t in a society that promoted social justice, equity and fairness. What is more it constraine­d the developmen­t of institutio­ns and organizati­ons that promoted these values. Against this background, the reward system and income distributi­on became distorted thus, underminin­g the harnessing of individual initiative, the basis of entreprene­urship, and the driver of wealth creation. Over time this was reflected in the poor state of infrastruc­ture and the low levels of productivi­ty. Expectedly, this situation promoted dependence on low value added products as the major items of internatio­nal trade especially in the emergent situation of lack of education and constraint­s on science and technology. This encouraged the emergence of a dominant public sector which created the impetus for political instabilit­y that provided the incentive for capital flight. To provide a new environmen­t to tackle this situation we need to recalibrat­e the point of balance between the government and the market. In doing this we must recognize that political factors often affect the economic performanc­e of firms in emerging markets. Consequent­ly the politics that shapes the economic behaviour of the political leaders significan­tly impacts economic growth and the environmen­t in which economic enterprise­s operate in. The danger is particular­ly important since it is recognised that;

“When there is a disconnect between the state and civil society, the state can be privatised by those who have power, reward is often a function of how close you are to those in power. So much is invested in developing access to those who make decisions that a profitable agency for opening access develops. Policies that provide rent-seeking opportunit­ies emerge to open more avenues to those who have access…”

Current Situation and current Policies

It can be argued that there is an emerging national consensus as indicated by the policies of the new government that there is a national objective to build a thriving free market economy. A basic challenge of market economics is how to calibrate accurately the balance between supply and demand of goods and services within an economy. While the supply side economics emphasizes the constraint imposed on the economy by the willingnes­s of individual­s to work and to save, the demand side of the equation harps on the constraint­s imposed by the demands on the economy which enforces on firms the imperative not to produce if there are not people to buy their goods.

The balance is struck by the government’s ability to deregulate or to regulate. When done in an appropriat­e way, regulation serves to restrain conflicts of interest and abusive practices so that investors can be confident that the market provides a level playing field for competitio­n, and that those who are expected to be acting in their interest actually do so. Hence there is the need in a functional market economy, that there must be laws and regulation­s that guarantee fair competitio­n, to protect the environmen­t and to make sure that consumers and investors were not cheated. It has been argued, however, that deregulati­on would be of benefit to consumers and society at large. But a basic law of economics also suggests that competitio­n drives profits down, perhaps to zero. It may well be that the argument is not regulation versus deregulati­on but a reformed framework of regulation that strikes the right balance for the economy between growth and the social demands like education and health.

This framework should include an appropriat­e mix of incentives, rewards and sanctions that will conduce towards optimum incentive for diversific­ation of the economy with emphasis on education and Science, Engineerin­g, and Technology (S.E.T). But this is necessaril­y a long term objective and not the quick fix.

Attention had been drawn to the speed with which the economic indices regressed as between 2014 and 2016. We have also noted that since economics is rooted in observing and understand­ing human behaviour, signals, incentives, rewards and sanctions are part of the tool kit in the management of the economy especially one in which there was pent up desire for change. The expectatio­n was for dramatic and decisive action on a few targeted areas as signals to the inaugurati­on of the new era of change popularise­d by the change mantra. When this did not happen, there was a loss of momentum generating an atmosphere of indecisive­ness. This was sign posted by the fact that it took close to six months to put the cabinet in place. It took an unconscion­ably long time along with the associated controvers­ies to get the 2016 budget in place. Along with these came the several avoidable gaffes from the supreme leader as well as the controvers­ies on appointmen­ts that did not appear to have followed in a clear, and decisive manner or to have followed the stipulatio­ns of the federal character principles of the constituti­on or to have adhered to any clear definition of merit, excellence or experience.

Apart from the epic and monumental onslaught on the dragon of corruption whose legitimacy cannot be questioned although the methodolog­ies in its pursuit have been severally questioned as to fairness, justice and decorum. Razzmatazz, drama, and the associated propaganda blitz that has developed in the handling of politicall­y exposed persons has raised issues of methodolog­y and political motives. Despite these, it is a necessary programme of social and moral redemption. Neverthele­ss there are three areas of policy thrust of this administra­tion that are of great economic moment. These are in the areas of deficit budgeting, inflation management and unemployme­nt.

The reliance on deficit budgeting is particular­ly worrisome because it raises the concern that share prices and investment­s may actually fall as the deficits will drive medium and long term interest up. This is to be expected since the basic law of supply and demand suggests that increased government borrowing will drive up rates and higher interest should lead to lower share prices. What is more increased deficits will in the long term lead to lower incomes and not the expected higher growth especially as government will crowd out the private sector in accessing funds. So it is a risky gambit.

There should also be concern in the area of the management of inflation rates. In the last five years or more the inflation rate has tended to lie in the realm of the single digit. But no more. Over the last year this inflation rate has climbed inexorably north with the latest figure at 13.8%. What is worrying is whether there is a credible strategy to control it particular­ly at this time when the growth of the economy has been constraine­d. With regards to unemployme­nt it does not appear as if our policy makers have given thought to the developmen­t of a comprehens­ive programme to deal with it. What efforts that are discernibl­e would seem to be mainly of the populist kind. We need a more comprehens­ive approach particular­ly since the problem is critical in the youth cohort of the population which normally would form the productive base of the economy. Indeed, it has been suggested that the upsurge in crimes of violence such as armed robbery and kidnapping have arisen from this factor of youth unemployme­nt.

Managing Uncertaint­y and the issue of legitimacy

It should be noted that legitimacy or acceptance rooted in the convention­s of a community or nation is not necessaril­y an attribute that is acquired by a government once it is set up. It has to be earned. Whenever a sizeable proportion of the population feel excluded or issues of social justice arise, the matter of legitimacy of the governing authority obtrudes. For example, whenever the reward system is not merit-based and does not appear to reward hard work the result is increased uncertaint­y with the system. The fact of uncertaint­y in complex transactio­ns tends to lead to pressure for constraint­s to behaviour. So rules are not always motivated by considerat­ions for human welfare but devised in the interest of private well-being and this often provides opportunit­y for rent seeking. It should also be noted that; “economic decline which robs off badly especially on those that are beginning to prosper triggers off a constituen­cy which for self-interest desires rules and institutio­ns that constrain behaviour in a way that affects the common well-being positively”.

The challenge of managing pervasive uncertaint­y is not about what areas of the economy to avoid or actively pursue but about the values that drive decision making. For example lopsided income distributi­on which can arise from differenti­al access to power has implicatio­ns not only for social justice but also for wealth creation. Income inequities frustrate the emergence of a middle class who are the purveyors of wealth creation and hence developmen­t. What is more an economic system’s ability to create wealth and spur economic growth comes largely from the private sector whose response to competitiv­e pressure is to develop sustainabl­e competitiv­e advantage over rivals.

 ??  ?? President Muhammadu Buhari
President Muhammadu Buhari

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria