THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF A LETTER

Femi Odere writes that Tunji Abayomi’s letters to Bola Tinubu is tearing the APC apart

Dr. Tunji Abayomi’s epistles to Asiwaju Ahmed Bola Tinubu, the National Leader of the All Progressives Party (APC) in exercising his right to endorse Olusegun Abraham may have come and gone. But it’s noteworthy that not a few of the everyday people (considering their reactions to Abayomi’s letter on the social media), observers of politics and its pundits found the missives in bad taste, if not misguided. Abayomi’s letters (most especially the first one) did not only attempt to redefine and refashion political endorsement, that age-old, time-tested and internationally acceptable political tool that the national leader rightly exercised to support the aspiration of Olusegun Abraham for reasons best known to him, since there’s no disputing the fact that he knows virtually all the major aspirants in many ways than one in their contestation for the APC ticket. It was not the first time that Asiwaju had exercised his right to endorse. And his endorsement of Olusegun Abraham will neither be the last. In 2015, Asiwaju endorsed the aspiration of Gen. Muhammadu Buhari in the wake of the presidential primary that had been adjudged to be the most free, fair and transparent primary election in Nigeria in recent memory. But Abayomi would rather that Asiwaju, a national political colossus and a huge stakeholder in the southwest politics, sits back and allow an aspirant who may be fronting for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) or someone who has no interest of the party that gave him the ticket at heart to trash it at the poll. Because Asiwaju has always operated with uncommon resolve in areas where other political titans fear to even contemplate, let alone tread, what others see as his somewhat unconventional approach to politics and his well-calculated endorsements has almost always produced, and continues to produce high-achieving governors, among other public officials. His endorsement of Olusegun Abraham will be no exception when this international businessman and accomplished engineer becomes the governor of the Sunshine State.

As much as one is wont to see Abayomi’s open letters to Asiwaju as mere politics that no one should lose any sleep over, its negative effects has not only begun to manifest on that all-important cohesiveness of the party, but it may yet be used as a basis to float another political party after the primaries to which some of the aspirants who never wished the party well in the first place would defect. Although in the face of lack of credible and verifiable evidence, one may not be too far from the truth to infer that Abayomi’s letters were the ‘tonic’ that emboldened some miscreants, probably with the backing of some chieftains who are fifth columnists in the party when they reportedly passed “a vote of no confidence” and subsequently announced the sack of a duly elected state chairman Isaac Kekemeke. A mere endorsement doesn’t get any more amazing than that. And you never know the unpredictable surprise and its level of intensity, if not its treachery, that politics will throw up just when you least expected.

With Abayomi’s missives, one can also infer that the stage is already set to substitute an endorsement for imposition by the fifth columnists within the party after the August 27 primary regardless of its authenticity and credibility. Asiwaju’s legitimate right to endorse someone (which in this case falls on Olusegun Abraham in this particular gubernatorial race in Ondo State) will be negatively played up to the maximum in the public space by some of the losers and moles within the party. They will cast aspersions on Abraham even in the face of overwhelming evidence that the primary election was free, fair, transparent and thus credible. What is more, it should also be expected that the state’s “chief mischief maker” Dr. Olusegun Mimiko will not only play up this nefarious “imposition” trump card in all the airwaves under his control, but will also recruit foot-soldiers to engage in scare-mongering that Tinubu “the bogeyman” is once again coming to invade Ondo State with several bullion vans from Bourdillon Road with Abraham as his partner in crime before the electorate. But one hopes that the people of Ondo State has now known who has carted away their collective patrimony not to allow the lies the second time. This is the more reason why it’s extremely important that one must not relent in shouting from the rooftop even if the voice cracks and becomes hoarse in the process that members of this progressive party must subscribe to the highest level of discipline. They should channel their legitimate grievances to the appropriate official channels rather than resort to self-help. It’s against this background that the pathetic incident at the state secretariat of the party must be investigated and sanctions applied to anyone found culpable in that madness no matter how highly placed in the party.

Perhaps Abayomi’s letters has brought into the fore the contending issue of the rights and privileges of the leadership of the party vis-à-vis that of its members that need to be interrogated and settled once and for all. While Abayomi’s letters has proven once again that the enemy within can be more dangerous and lethal than the adversaries without, it has also revealed the chronic lack of understanding of who should be on the driver’s seat between a political party in a representative democracy and its actors. Although it may not have been explicitly stated, Abayomi’s disposition may not be unconnected to what may have been his belief that the leadership of the party may have inadvertently subsumed its rights within that of its major stakeholders in its state chapters most especially when it comes to who becomes the party’s standard bearer when aspirants go into the field in their individual capacities to expend their energies and financial resources on delegates to increase their chances of winning at the polls. This mindset may be fundamentally responsible for most of the intractable frictions that had always existed between political parties and their resource-endowed members in the country.