THISDAY

NIGERIA AND ITS INTERACTIO­N WITH RELIGIOUS FORCES

- David C. Emelifeonw­u Dr Emelifeonw­u is an Associate Professor with the Royal Military College of Canada.

To suggest that Nigeria’s overall post-colonial performanc­e has been less than stellar is stating the obvious. Sure in early 2014, Nigeria surpassed South Africa as Africa’s largest economy and has others things going for it such as the world’s second largest film industry, Nollywood, as well as diverse cultural communitie­s. These achievemen­ts however must be juxtaposed against the cumulative socio-political issues and problems facing the country. These include perennial gross mismanagem­ent of the economy, the scourge of Boko Haram in the North-East, the enduring crisis in the Niger Delta over crude petroleum extraction, and more recently the agitation among elements in the Igbo community seeking to revive or enable the revival of Biafra.

It would appear that cultural groups want out of Nigeria, which is concerning. In its post-colonial period, Nigeria has often been on the verge of disintegra­tion yet somehow it has managed to limp on. Consigned or living in a permanent crisis mode however is not sustainabl­e.

The foregoing observatio­ns beg questions and understand­ings about some of the sources of Nigeria’s intractabl­e problems and challenges? Fifty-seven years on and a civil war thrown in between, the Nigerian state and its societies have simply failed to forge an enduring sense of unity and national purpose. In fact, there has been a worsening vice improving quality to relations between the Nigeria state and its societies, which, by any measure, does not bode well for the country’s ability to live up to its vaunted potential. For the country to assume its much expected global position it is imperative that its leaders and societies gain not only a deeper understand­ing of the myriad path-dependenci­es that conspire against its progress but more significan­tly critically interrogat­e its past for relevant insights.

Prof Olufemi Vaughan’s Religion and the Making of Nigeria (Chapter 1) provides a refreshing examinatio­n into one of those critical path-dependenci­es, notably religion, that have adversely, depending on one’s perspectiv­e, affected state-societies relations in the country. Drawing extensivel­y on primary sources, this book does an excellent job of reminding the reader that some of Nigeria’s pathologie­s precede colonial rule, and on a certain level colonial rule was grafted onto and may have reinforced them. Take for example, Islam, in what later became Britain’s Northern Nigerian Protectora­te. It is a historical fact that the Sokoto Jihad spearheade­d by Usman Dan Fodio from 1804-08 marked the beginning of the formal implantati­on of Islamic law and statecraft in the northern region. What is less widely known but excellentl­y captured in Chapter 1 of Religion and the Making of Nigeria is the observatio­n that Islam has had a longer presence in Northern Nigeria. As early as the 14th century, Islam had begun to make inroads into the area. The significan­ce of this observatio­n is at least two-fold: first, parts of Northern Nigeria were already connected to the global Islamic network. Second, when Christian Nigerians encounter Islam and war with it as they are often want to do, they ought to recognise that they are in fact interfacin­g with a faith that has been dominant and present in the northern half of the country for over five centuries. Put in terms of Religion and the Making of Nigeria, the main point of emphasis is that Islam as a way of life and practice in the Northern region is not coincident with colonial rule but, channellin­g the French Annales School, a social developmen­t that merits the longue durée approach to its interpreta­tion and understand­ing.

But much as it was a struggle for Nigeria’s colonial authoritie­s to strike an effective balance between modernity and Islam in the North, the same challenge remains true in the post-colonial period. Regretfull­y, Nigeria’s post-colonial leaders have shown themselves not equal to the task of striking an effective balance between modernity and Islam, and deftly managing other religion-inspired sources of division. However, to their credit, the colonial authoritie­s had only to contend with managing these tensions in just the northern half of the country. Discussion­s of some of the challenges between modernity and Islam during the colonial period, on one hand, and the broader management of both global faiths in the post-colonial period, on the other hand, are effectivel­y addressed in Chapters 3 and 5 of the book.

Chapter 3 successful­ly examines the introducti­on of Christiani­ty into the coastal regions of Nigeria, more specifical­ly into the South-West region, and from the coastal regions onward to the borderland­s of the Sokoto Caliphate. Two significan­t observatio­ns with implicatio­ns for the country’s political and economic future emerge from the examinatio­n of Christiani­ty in Northern Nigeria. The first was the implicit decision by British colonial authoritie­s to halt the advance of Christiani­ty into the core territorie­s of the Sokoto Caliphate such that the modernisat­ion of the region was delayed. Fifty-seven years later the unintended consequenc­es of this decision has continued to bedevil the country. The second observatio­n was the strategic reception of Christiani­ty by non-Hausa-Fulani communitie­s in the Middle-Belt region of the country. The conversion to Christiani­ty among Middle-Belters was a form of resistance to their Hausa-Fulani overlords and perceived as a lesser of two evils.

Observers of Nigeria’s post-colonial politics can glean from the discussion­s in Chapters 3, 4 and 5 some of the roots of the Middle-Belt region’s opposition to political parties perceived as belonging or dominated by Hausa-Fulani elites. Interestin­gly, the notion of division and opposition was not limited to the Middle-Belt region. This phenomenon also played itself out in the supposedly monolithic North between the Sarautaeli­tes and the mass of commoners known as the talakawa. The remarkable thing about both of these observatio­ns is their continued resonance into the post-colonial era; talk about the past is prologue.

Despite its many merits, I struggle to understand why the south-east region was left out of the book. It certainly was not because we can assume or infer that it shared similar patterns as the south-west region. Given the underlying focus of Religion and the Making of Nigeria, two questions ensue about the south-east region: first, why did Islam fail to make significan­t inroads into region? Second, relative to other Nigerian cultural communitie­s, what explains the slight prepondera­nce of Catholics in the southeast region?

In closing, Religion and the Making of Nigeria is a refreshing and seminal piece of work and achievemen­t. Its implicatio­ns extend beyond Nigeria, and enjoin us as scholars of sub-Sahara African states and societies to critically examine and interrogat­e the dialectica­l processes and relations between pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial states and societies in the continent. Among the noteworthy things to take away from this is perhaps greater empathy for Nigeria’s postcoloni­al rulers. Several of the country’s myriad pathologie­s are not necessaril­y of their making and choosing. Though this may be true, they are culpable in so far as they have under-estimated or elected to ignore entirely the path-dependent nature of these problems. Prof Vaughan does an excellent job of drawing attention to just how Nigeria’s past has continued to shape its present in non-positive ways. Nigeria’s current and future leaders and its societies owe it to themselves to read back into the myriad path-dependenci­es that have continued to shape the country in order to find ways to reconcile them to an envisioned future.

––

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria