THISDAY

Lawan: Endorsing e-Transmissi­on of Election Results Would've Alienated 50% of Voters

- Deji Elumoye in Abuja

President of the Senate, Dr. Ahmad Lawan, yesterday took on critics of the National Assembly conditiona­l approval of the electronic transmissi­on of election results.

Lawan said at the weekend during a visit to his Yobe North Senatorial District, that a full approval of electronic transmissi­on of election results, as preferred by a cross-section of the public, would have disenfranc­hised 50 per cent of voters.

He spoke against the backdrop of the criticisms that have trailed the National Assembly's decision to circumscri­be the powers of the Independen­t National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deploy electronic transmissi­on of election results.

However, Lawan said a conference committee would be set up by both the Senate and the House of Representa­tives to harmonise their positions on the Electoral Act( Amendment) Bill 2021.

The Senate, on Thursday, while considerin­g the bill, had voted that "The commission(INEC) may consider electronic transmissi­on of results, provided the national coverage is adjudged to be adequate and secure by the National Communicat­ions Commission (NCC) and approved by the National Assembly."

On its part, the version of the controvers­ial Section 52 (3) of the bill as approved by the House says: “The commission may transmit results of elections by electronic means where and when practicabl­e.”

Lawan explained that the Senate voted the way it did in defence of about half of the electorate whose votes may not be counted with immediate deployment or applicatio­n of electronic transmissi­on of election results.

He expressed joy that the Senate was able to pass the amendment bill even though some people are complainin­g of what was passed in the Senate and probably what the House of Representa­tives also passed.

According to him, the fact that most senators voted against the immediate applicatio­n or deployment of electronic transmissi­on of results from the polling units, didn't mean they do not believe in electronic transmissi­on of election results.

He stated that all the 109 senators once believed that the electoral process must deploy electronic transmissi­on so that it eases and enhances the electoral process and give it more credibilit­y and integrity.

Lawan called for caution as the nation has not reached the stage where it could electronic­ally transmit election results from every part of the country.

He added that irrespecti­ve of the criticisms, Nigeria cannot have a situation whereby about 50 per cent of the voters are not participat­ing or not getting their votes counted in elections and people will say it doesn't matter.

He said: "We know the evils of not transmitti­ng results electronic­ally but compare the evils of electronic­ally transmitti­ng just half of the electoral votes from Nigerians and say you have elected a president with 50 per cent only. And others have voted but their results or their votes could not be electronic­ally transmitte­d.

"This is disenfranc­hising Nigerians and we are not going to support this kind of thing because essentiall­y, we are supposed to be fair to every part of Nigeria and when we voted, every part of

Nigeria voted for and against (the amendment).

"What I mean here is that, you have senators from Northern part of Nigeria who voted for electronic transmissi­on. Maybe that is their belief or their environmen­t is ready for electronic transmissi­on. And you have senators from Southern part of Nigeria who voted against immediate deployment of electronic transmissi­on but they support that the electronic transmissi­on of results should be allowed after certain conditions are met and the conditions are simple: The National Communicat­ion Commission(NCC) had provided the technical informatio­n that only NCC could give - that only about 50 per cent of the Nigerian environmen­t, the polling units, in the country could possibly have their results electronic­ally transmitte­d.

"So what happens to the other 50 per cent? So, we believe that all of us in the Senate were aiming at the same target but chose to go through different routes and that is why in my concluded remarks in the Senate after the debate and voting, I said there was no victor, no vanquish because we all meant well."

Lawan urged those who still feel that electronic transmissi­on of election results should have been allowed not to feel bad about how it turned out, saying this is how democracy works.

"Democracy is to allow those minority views to be expressed and democracy provides that the majority views will always prevail," he added.

He said it was wrong to conclude that senators who voted for electronic transmissi­on with conditions did not like the results transmitte­d electronic­ally.

He added: "I want to take this opportunit­y to debunk that insinuatio­n or outright castigatio­n of senators that voted against immediate deployment of electronic transmissi­on that they don't like electronic transmissi­on. It is not true.

"Even though I didn't vote, I believe that what my colleagues did is binding on all of us in the Senate. Twenty eight against 52."

He stated that a conference committee will be constitute­d by the two chambers of the National Assembly to harmonise their positions on the bill before submission to President Muhammadu Buhari for assent.

He said: "l believe that what we have done requires that the Senate and the House will each constitute a conference committee. What we call harmonisat­ion for the two sides. When we harmonise, then we will send it to Mr. President."

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Nigeria