In Surprise Move, Buhari Rejigs Cabinet, Fires Agric, Power Ministers
● Redeploys two others ● Abubakar replaces Nanono, Aliyu replaces Mamman ● Says changes part of his government's ‘tradition of subjecting projects and programmes implementation to independent, critical self-review’ ● Don’t use sacked ministers as cover up for your failure, PDP tells president
For the first time in the over six years old administration of President Muhammadu Buhari, a minor cabinet reshuffle was effected yesterday, with two ministers losing their jobs and two others redeployed.
Those sacked were Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Mohammed Sabo Nanono, and Minister of Power, Saleh Mamman.
Minister of Environment,
Mohammed Abubakar, was redeployed to Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, while Minister of State for Works and Housing, Abubakar Aliyu, was elevated to Minister of Power.
It was the first midstream cabinet reorganisation by Buhari since the inception of his government in 2015.
The president said the changes were part of his administration’s strategy of independent self-review.
But the main opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) described the president’s sack of the two ministers as an attempt to mask his failure in office.
Buhari broke the news of the cabinet reshuffle at the weekly virtual Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting at the State House, Abuja. He hinted that more ministers would be shown the way out in an urgent need to reinvigorate his cabinet.
Special Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina, who read the president's statement to newsmen after the FEC meeting, quoted Buhari as saying that the cabinet rearrangement was part of measures to identify and strengthen weak areas, close gaps, build cohesion and synergy in governance, manage the economy, and improve the delivery of public good to Nigerians
Adesina also revealed that the president would fill the two vacant ministerial positions soon after confirmation of substantive nominees to be sent to the Senate in line with the provisions of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.
The president’s statement read, "On Wednesday 21 August 2019 the current FEC was sworn-in after a rigorous retreat to bring returning and new members up to speed on the accomplishments, challenges and lessons drawn from my first term in office and to emphasise the nine priority areas of government for the second term.
"Two years and some months into the second term, the tradition of subjecting our projects and programmes implementation to independent and critical self-review has taken firm roots through sector reporting during cabinet meetings and at retreats.
"These significant review steps have helped to identify and strengthen weak areas, close gaps, build cohesion and synergy in governance, manage the economy and improve the delivery of public good to Nigerians.”
It added, “I must commend this cabinet for demonstrating unparalleled resilience that helped the government to navigate the disruption to global systems and governance occasioned by the emergence of COVID-19 shortly after inauguration. The weekly FEC meetings were not spared because the traditional mode was altered.
"As we are all aware, change is the only factor that is constant in every human endeavour and as this administration approaches its critical phase in the second term, I have found it essential to reinvigorate this cabinet in a manner that will deepen its capacity to consolidate legacy achievements.”
The president pointed out that he had personally met with the sacked ministers to thank them for their contributions to discussions in cabinet as well as the invaluable services they rendered to the nation.
He stated, “Today, effectively marks their last participation in the FEC deliberations and I wish them the best in all future endeavours.
"Finally, I wish to reiterate once more, that this process shall be continuous.”
However, reacting to the president’s decision to sack the two ministers, some operators in the power and agriculture sectors said both men added no value to the respective sectors they were overseeing.
National Coordinator, All Nigerian Electricity Consumers Protection Forum, Mr. Adeola Samuel-Ilori, told THISDAY, with regard to Mamman’s sack, that consumers were indifferent to his discharge because they never felt his impact throughout his time in the saddle.
Samuel-Ilori said there was hardly anything that portrayed him as being in-charge of the power ministry. He alleged that Mamman was merely interested in protecting some interests in the sector.
Samuel-Ilori alleged, “The consumers’ feeling cannot be different, we are indifferent, and you know why, while the man held sway, there was no feeling of his presence in that office. There was nothing he did that showed that he was in charge of the ministry or that he was overseeing either TCN or NERC and every other person. So, I don’t see any reason why the consumers should feel anything about his absence.
“If you go back to how the man emerged, it would tell you that the man came for a purpose and I’m sure that the purpose must have been fulfilled.”
An operator, who pleaded to remain anonymous, also alleged that the sacked power minister never added value to the sector.
The operator said about Mamman, “He was just a stumbling block in the system. The president told him to set up a board for the Transmission Commission of Nigeria, but he was just foot-dragging. Also he wasn’t willing to support Siemens and he kept foot-dragging as well.
“We hold regular meetings with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) on the power sector, where we always have top officials of the central bank, but he hardly attended.
“We also met with the Minister of Finance and officials of the Debt Management Office, but he was hardly in attendance. All our challenges, he is not the one resolving them, it is either the CBN Governor or Minister of Finance.”
Similarly, commenting on the sack of Nanono, an operator in the agriculture sector said he was never fit for the role. The source also preferred to remain anonymous.
The source also noted the recent stockpiling of some agricultural produce by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development under Nanono, which contributed to inflationary pressure in the country.
Nanono had awarded contracts to some organisations to mop up some commodities, including maize, sorghum and rice and the move led to increase in the price of maize and rice. The arrangement, which was termed, “Emergency Procurement”, had contradicted efforts by policymakers in the country to tame inflation.