Oman Daily Observer

It’s not Akbar vs Ramani, but Govt vs Ramani

-

NEW DELHI: “This is not M J Akbar vs Priya Ramani, this is the Union of India vs Priya Ramani. He has access to a battery of powerful lawyers: There are 97 listed in the legal notice. She has, thus far, one,” said Samar Halarnkar, Ramanis husband and a fellow journalist.

In a piece written for Scroll.in on Tuesday, Halarnkar, the editor of Indiaspend said he and his wife have only “one important weapon” against the “vast resources” a Union Minister can deploy — and that is “truth”.

“Akbar has filed a case of criminal defamation against my wife. His intention is clear: To intimidate her, and through her to intimidate others who have spoken up and silence others who have not.”

Akbar, the Minister of State for External Affairs, on Monday filed a criminal defamation case in New Delhi against Ramani who has accused Akbar of sexually harassing her as an editor.

Ramani is among several women journalist­s who have named Akbar for a range of inappropri­ate workplace behaviour.

Halarnkar said his wife never lacked courage. Yet, it took a “special kind of courage” to name a powerful minister and former editor.

“While she did not regard her action as taking on a minister, she was somewhat aware that anyone who set the ball rolling might become a target. That is what happened.

“This kind of intimidati­on carries big benefits for small effort. We do not, for example, have institutio­nal backing to fight the case Akbar has filed. We do not have friends in Delhi’s powerful circles of politician­s, bureaucrat­s and lawyers. We know he has vast resources to deploy; it startled us to see how quickly he could get our home address,” he wrote.

He wondered if it was thanks to the culture of a normalised harassment and male impunity in profession­al lives that “India’s elected government feels it can either ignore or mock the accounts of a diverse lot of women and stand by a lie”.

He rued at the lack of any “expression­s of support” from opposition parties.

“(It is) because they are all complicit in maintainin­g the status quo. India’s patriarchy understand­s what is at stake and will not give in without a bitter fight. If an Akbar is conceded, there are countless others whose careers will be in jeopardy.

However, said Halarnkar, the #Metoo movement has demonstrat­ed that harassment or intimidati­on was not normal and that no woman should have to put up with it. — IANS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Oman