‘No proof yet that Russian plane broke up in flight’
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said it was inappropriate to link the Russian airliner crash to Russia’s military strategy in Syria
CAIRO: Egypt’s civil aviation ministry said on Tuesday there were no facts to substantiate assertions by Russian officials that the Russian airliner that crashed in Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula on Saturday broke up in mid-air.
But spokesman Mohamed Rahmi confirmed that no distress call had been received before the crash, which left wreckage from the Metrojet Airbus 321, carrying Russian holidaymakers back to St Petersburg from the Sinai Red Sea resort of Sharm El Sheikh, strewn over more than 3km (2 miles) of desert.
“No communication from the pilot was recorded at the navigation centres requesting anything,” he said. Rahmi said the investigating team, led by Egypt and aided by experts from Russia, Airbus and Ireland, where the plane is registered, had returned to the crash site on Tuesday morning.
Once investigations at the site were completed, probably later in the day, they would focus on analysing the contents of the black box flight recorders, Rahmi said.
Sources on the investigation committee have said the recorders are in good condition and should yield clues. Rahmi said there was no proof yet that the plane had broken up in flight.
Long process
“This could be a long process and we can’t talk about the results as we go along,” he said.
However, the fact that no distress call was received, and the wreckage was scattered widely, has suggested a sudden breakup to many experts.
Theories floated so far range from a missile attack, or a bomb on board, to a structural failure.
A Sinai-based Egyptian militant group allied to IS claimed on Saturday to have shot down the plane in response to Russia’s military intervention in Syria in support of President Bashar Al Assad against rebels including IS.
However, the militants are not believed to have missiles capable of hitting a plane at 30,000 feet.
A source in the committee analysing the flight recorders said on Monday that the plane had not been struck from the outside.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday it was inappropriate to link the crash to Russia’s military strategy in Syria. Some have also pointed to a 2001 incident, when the Airbus 321’s tail section struck the tarmac on landing, as a possible cause of structural weakness.
Faulty “tail-strike” repairs have caused at least two catastrophic crashes in the past.
However, the plane had passed safety checks and its operator, Kogalymavia, owner of the Metrojet brand, has said damage from the 2001 mishap was fully repaired and could not have been a factor in the Sinai crash.
The head of the health unit at Sharm El Sheikh airport, Medhat Qandil, said the remains of the last 28 people killed in the crash had been sent to Moscow on Tuesday aboard a military jet, along with luggage from the doomed plane and personal belongings found at the crash site.