EU signs off watered down eurozone reform
On Friday, EU leaders signed off a laundry list of highly complex reforms to better protect the euro from another financial crisis
BRUSSELS: French President Emmanuel Macron barnstormed to power in 2017, promising to inject the European project — and especially the euro single currency — with much-needed oomph.
On Friday, EU leaders signed off on the fruit of that campaign, a laundry list of highly complex reforms to better protect the euro from another crisis.
The measures plainly fall short of Macron’s grand ambition, undone by a dithering Germany and the unexpected resistance of a determined band of mostly northern countries led by the Netherlands.
The reforms, summarised below, are much watered down from the original plan, with a highly tentative proposal to explore a eurozone budget the only change that Macron can sell back home.
Eurozone budget
The flagship idea, presented by Macron in 2017, of a specific budget for the 19 countries of the single currency has been considerably squeezed.
Sceptical countries, led by the Netherlands, have agreed only to discuss incorporating the idea as a slice of the EU budget of the full 27 (post Brexit) member nations.
The budget’s main objective will be to help along politically painful reforms and to help deliver greater economic convergence between the 19 countries using the euro.
Germany refused to agree the “stabilisation” budget sought by France, in which funds could assist a country hit by an unexpected economic shock (such as Ireland in the event of a chaotic Brexit).
Despite the narrow scope, France hailed a symbolic victory.
European Monetary Fund?
An easier sell was strengthening the power of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), the euro zone firefighter, created in 2012 in the heat of the debt crisis.
The ESM is governed by the 19 eurozone finance ministers — also known as the Eurogroup — and uses national cash to raise funds on the markets which it then grants in bailout loans to crisishit countries in return for closely scrutinised reforms.
Eager to take on new responsibilities, the Luxembourg-based ESM has been granted greater powers to assess the economic and financial situation of the euro area countries.
This potentially puts it on a collision course with the European Commission, which does much the same in Brussels, though with less oversight from national capitals, to the frustration of some fiscally conservative ministers
In the end, the commission will continue to hold the reins in the yearly monitoring of member spending plans, but will have “regular meetings” with the ESM.
Liquidity problems
In the reforms, countries that have finances on an overall good footing but have a sudden liquidity problems will also be able to tap into the war chest and not in return for a raft of painful reforms (such as was the case for Greece).
These changes require amending the existing European Stability Mechanism treaty, a process that will require more wrangling and could take much of next year.
Banking union
Completing the banking union — launched in 2012 — is a central challenge for EU leaders, but the last missing piece is the toughest.
The creation of a Europeanwide deposit insurance scheme, known as EDIS, has been bitterly opposed by Berlin for years in the belief that Germany would be on the hook to save fragile banks of allegedly spendthrift countries such as Greece and Italy.
The objective of EDIS is to avoid a bank run and, under the scheme, all EU deposits up to 100,000 euros ($113,000) would be insured through a treasure chest that was guaranteed by taxpayer money.
EU leaders ignored it and ministers last week only agreed to start a “high level working group” that will decide in June 2019 on any next steps.