National Herald Tribune

New electoral system ensures patriots administer­ing HK

-

Editor's note: The election for the sixthterm chief executive of the Hong Kong Special Administra­tive Region was held on Sunday under the reformed electoral system. Three experts share their views with China Daily on the prospects of Hong Kong taking forward its developmen­t after the election.

The fifth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Hong Kong Special Administra­tive Region has gradually subsided, and life is slowly returning to normal. However, due to a lack of customs clearance between Hong Kong and the mainland, the Guangdong-Hong KongMacao Greater Bay Area and the "Northern Metropolis" developmen­t plans could face delays and challenges.

So Hong Kong should make up for lost time by promoting social reconcilia­tion within the city, building a consensus on developmen­t, and returning to the rational track of democracy and rule of law. And it could start the process with the election of the sixth-term chief executive-elect on Sunday.

A central aim of "one country, two systems" is to promote Hong Kong's stability and prosperity, with stability being a prerequisi­te for prosperity.

Over the past decade, Hong Kong has fallen into the trap of "excessive politiciza­tion". Since the 2014 illegal "Occupy Central" movement and the 2019 "antiextrad­ition" riots, Hong Kong society has been divided, social trust is low, and relations between the government and the people have been tense, and rule of law and social order have eroded, with transforma­tive growth encounteri­ng severe challenges.

These factors that have led to instabilit­y in Hong Kong can be partly attributed to economic inequality, while the more underlying cause is that "patriots administer­ing Hong Kong" hasn't taken root in the city. Hong Kong authoritie­s also need to make up for the deficit in loyalty to "one country, two systems" by improving their ability to govern the city.

In fact, the so-called "anti-extraditio­n bill" turmoil and the pandemic outbreaks are closely related to the weak foundation of "patriots administer­ing Hong Kong" and ineffectiv­e governance.

The National People's Congress Standing Committee introduced the National Security Law for Hong Kong in 2020 and later reformed the electoral system to improve the institutio­nal system of "one country, two systems".

The system reconstruc­tion takes "patriots administer­ing Hong Kong" as the fundamenta­l principle. While the National Security Law is aimed at preventing or dealing with social disorder, and ensuring Hong Kong residents' safety, the core principles of the new electoral system are balanced participat­ion and orderly democracy, which is in stark contrast to the old electoral system, under which some local radicals and foreign forces tried to turn the city into a hotbed of subversion.

An "unsafe" Hong Kong endangers the city, and also comprises the security of the entire country, especially the safety of the socialist system. The riots in 2019 and the radicals' interventi­on in Hong Kong's District Council election and 2020 power grab plan exposed the loopholes in the old electoral system.

On the other hand, the reformed electoral system will thwart attempts to trigger a "color revolution" in Hong Kong, and better safeguard national security. Indeed, the reformed electoral system is democratic, and in line with "one country, two systems" and Hong Kong's real situation.

In fact, the white paper, titled "Hong Kong Democratic Progress under the Framework of One Country, Two Systems" and issued by the State Council Informatio­n Office in December 2021, gives an authoritat­ive explanatio­n of the history, jurisprude­nce and institutio­n of the "one country, two systems" principle.

The new electoral system will help Hong Kong residents elect competent members to the Legislativ­e Council and a capable and qualified chief executive who meet the requiremen­ts of "patriots administer­ing Hong Kong".

First, the new electoral system will allow only patriots to contest the elections, and prevent anti-China forces from disrupting Hong Kong's governance or triggering a "color revolution".

Second, the focus of elections in Hong Kong has shifted from the political system to concrete policies. Candidates no longer have to take extreme positions, and instead contest elections based on their abilities and policies to govern Hong Kong.

And third, the new electoral system has drasticall­y squeezed room for external forces interferin­g in Hong Kong, and will thus help the city to achieve a high degree of autonomy under "one country, two systems", and facilitate the SAR's integratio­n with the motherland's developmen­t.

Hong Kong faces big challenges, but with the institutio­nal guarantee of "one country, two systems", the full support of the central authoritie­s, the improved electoral system and its economic advantages, the city is capable of getting out of the predicamen­t and maintainin­g its position as a leading global financial center and logistics hub.

Hong Kong's strategic role, as part of "one country, two systems", in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is clear. It is an engine of the Greater Bay Area and one of the eight prime economic centers in the 14th FiveYear Plan (2021-25).

Apart from its traditiona­l advantages as a leading internatio­nal financial, and trade and shipping hub, Hong Kong is also slowly becoming an innovation and high-tech hub, Sino-foreign cultural and artistic exchange center, and a regional intellectu­al property trading center thanks to the continuous economic growth of the mainland.

The developmen­t of Hong Kong in the new era requires comprehens­ive and forward-looking strategic guidance, as well as policy support. That is exactly where the new electoral system and the new chief executive come into play.

Hong Kong also needs more security guarantees to cope with the fierce SinoUS disputes and difference­s, and therefore should further integrate with the motherland's developmen­t plan and try to benefit more from the Belt and Road Initiative. -

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Pakistan