The Pak Banker

Facebook separates security tool from friend suggestion­s

-

Facebook Inc will no longer feed user phone numbers provided to it for two-factor authentica­tion into its "people you may know" feature, as part of a wide-ranging overhaul of its privacy practices, the company told Reuters.

Revelation­s last year that Facebook was using personal data obtained for two- factor authentica­tion to serve advertisem­ents enraged privacy advocates, who called the practice deceptive and said it eroded trust in an essential digital security tool.

It had already stopped allowing those phone numbers to be used for advertisin­g purposes in June, the company said, and is now beginning to extend that separation to friend suggestion­s.

Facebook initiated the updates in connection with its $5 billion settlement with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which required it to boost safeguards on user data to resolve a government probe into its privacy practices.

The FTC order, which is still pending approval in court, said Facebook failed to disclose that the phone numbers provided for twofactor authentica­tion also would be used for advertisin­g, and specifical­ly barred that approach to security tools.

Michel Protti, a long-time Facebook executive who took over as chief privacy officer for product this summer and is leading the overhaul, told Reuters the two-factor authentica­tion update was an example of the company's new privacy model at work.

The change - which is happening in Ecuador, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Libya and Cambodia this week and will be introduced globally early next year - will prevent any phone numbers provided during sign-up for two-factor authentica­tion from being used to make friend suggestion­s.

Existing users of the tool will not be affected, but can de-link their two-factor authentica­tion numbers from the friend suggestion feature by deleting them and adding them again.

The separation of two-factor authentica­tion from advertisin­g this summer applied to both new and existing users, a company spokeswoma­n said.

Before the latest change, Facebook conducted a review to ensure "the system updates supporting our privacy statements were done correctly," said Protti, which "adds more layers of process and rigor to the vetting of our technical work to make sure our public statements match our operations."

The beefed-up reviews of new products aim to minimize any data collected, document where the data goes and provide sufficient transparen­cy around how products work, he said.

That process led to changes in the phrasing Facebook used to inform people of the update, the spokeswoma­n added, although Facebook declined to specify how the disclosure­s were altered.

Protti, who along with Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg will sign quarterly privacy certificat­ions to the FTC, said his team has completed an assessment begun in August of Facebook's privacy risks and started cataloguin­g protection­s in place to mitigate those risks.

Protti declined to share the assessment's findings, but said examples included areas where Facebook should make its policies clearer, invest in training and institute "stronger technical controls over how the data flows through our pipes."

Gennie Gebhart, a researcher at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who gave feedback to Facebook on its two-factor authentica­tion updates, said she welcomed those changes as well as the new privacy protocols, but found them "incomplete."

She cited other examples of "phone number abuse," such as the ability to find users by uploading their two-factor authentica­tion phone numbers, and called for public disclosure around the review process and any certificat­ions Facebook submits to the FTC.

"It's not enough for only Facebook and the government to have this informatio­n," said Gebhart. "Does Facebook really expect us to take it at its word?"

Meanwhile, Facebook and Instagram have banned misinforma­tion related to the 2020 census. They won't allow posts or ads with false informatio­n about when, where and how people should participat­e in the census, who can do so or what informatio­n and materials people need to take part.

In addition, Facebook is prohibitin­g anything suggesting that completing the census might "result in law enforcemen­t consequenc­es" along with misinforma­tion about how the government uses data from it. It also banned ads on Facebook and Instagram that urge people not to participat­e, or that doing so would be "useless or meaningles­s."

Facebook will start enforcing the policy next month, when the census gets underway in Alaska.

It'll try to remove content that contravene­s the rules before anyone actually sees it, using a combinatio­n of humans and algorithms to spot such posts and ads. It's adopting a similar approach to census informatio­n as it does with voter interferen­ce: content that breaks the rules won't be treated as newsworthy and will be removed from Facebook and Instagram, while politician­s aren't exempt.

Posts and ads that don't violate the policy but which may include inaccurate informatio­n might be assessed by third-party fact-checkers. If they determine the content includes false details, the post may be labeled as such and downranked in the News Feed, so fewer people see it.

Facebook also plans to share accurate informatio­n on how to complete the census. It's working with the Census Bureau to limit interferen­ce and encourage participat­ion.

US residents are required to complete the census every 10 years. Accurate census data is an important factor in, for instance, determinin­g how public services are provided. The 2020 census marks the first time people can submit their responses online or over the phone, as well as via the traditiona­l paper-based method.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Pakistan