The Pak Banker

Review contradict­s Boris Johnson on claims

- LONDON -REUTERS

Prime Minister Boris Johnson told Britain's parliament on Wednesday that his government moved swiftly to protect the country's vulnerable care homes. Under increasing pressure to defend his record on fighting Covid-19, he said: "We brought in the lockdown in care homes ahead of the general lockdown."

An examinatio­n by Reuters of the guidance issued to care homes, as well as interviews with three care home providers, has provided no evidence that any such early lockdown was ordered. The government's handling of care homes has emerged as a major controvers­y in parliament. According to a Reuters analysis of official figures here the pandemic has resulted in over 20,000 deaths in UK care homes.

The prime minister's spokesman told reporters on Wednesday that in his comments earlier that day to parliament, Johnson was referring to government advice to care homes, issued on March 13. This advice, he said, was "recommendi­ng essential visits only, that obviously came before we took steps nationwide in relation to social distancing." The government issued a general lockdown order to the nation on March 23.

Instead, the document from Public Health England, an official agency, advised home providers to "review their visiting policy by asking no one to visit who has suspected Covid-19 or is generally unwell, and by emphasisin­g good hand hygiene for visitors." Balancing those restrictio­ns, it said that care home policies "should also consider the wellbeing of residents, and the positive impact of seeing friends and family." At a press conference on March 16, Johnson commented that "absolutely, we don't want to see people unnecessar­ily visiting care homes."

Reuters found no official guidance which made that advice mandatory. The news agency asked 10 Downing Street, Johnson's office, if it could point to any official order that care homes must close to outside visitors, prior to the broader UK lockdown on March 23. A government spokeswoma­n referred Reuters to the March 13 advice. Asked if there were further instructio­ns to care homes between March 13 and the March 23 general lockdown, the spokeswoma­n said there were not.

In a statement, the government said it had been "keeping in regular contact with care homes to provide guidance on reducing the spread of infection. We have continued to review and update our guidance, in line with the latest scientific advice." The government's cautious approach to imposing restrictio­ns was signaled earlier in March by Chris Whitty, the chief medical adviser. At the launch of the government's coronaviru­s action plan, on March 3, Whitty told journalist­s that specific advice for care homes would be issued in future, "but one of the things we are keen to avoid … is doing things too early."

He explained that premature action would bring no benefit "but what you do get is a social cost."

A investigat­ion last week here detailed how the government's focus on shielding hospitals, to prevent emergency wards from being overwhelme­d, left care home residents and staff exposed to COVID-19. To free up hospital beds, many patients were discharged into homes for the elderly and vulnerable, many without being tested for the coronaviru­s that causes the disease. On May 5, when Reuters initially asked the Department for Health and Social Care when an order was first given to ban care home visits by family and friends, a press officer responded: "There was no order, care providers make their own decisions about visitors."

 ?? WASHINGTON
- AP ?? US President Donald Trump explains why he has been taking a controvers­ial anti- malarial drug.
WASHINGTON - AP US President Donald Trump explains why he has been taking a controvers­ial anti- malarial drug.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Pakistan