The Pak Banker

Trump says he saved 51m jobs in pandemic, Economists, USofficial­s say otherwise

- WASHINGTON -AP

Standing before half a dozen American flags during a press conference at his country club in Bedminster, New Jersey, President Donald Trump heralded what has become a central plank of his argument for re-election in November: his administra­tion's handling of the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic.

"Through the historic relief package that I signed into law, we saved over 50 million American jobs," he said in the Aug. 15 remarks. Referring to his Democratic opponents, he said, "They don't like these kind of numbers because they think it'll hurt them in the election."

The estimate that the $660 billion taxpayer-funded Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) saved some 51 million jobs has been trumpeted by the Republican Party, its Congressio­nal leadership and the president's reelection campaign. On Monday, Trump touted it again at a rally west of Charlotte, North Carolina, site of the Republican National Convention.

However, the PPP likely did not save 51 million jobs, or anywhere close to it, according to Reuters interviews with economists and an analysis of the program's data. Half a dozen economists put the number of jobs saved by the initiative at only a fraction of 51 million - ranging between one million and 14 million.

"I don't think there is an economist who would say that the program has saved 50 million jobs," said Richard Prisinzano, who was a financial economist at the U.S. Department of the Treasury for 13 years before leaving in 2017. His rough estimate, Prisinzano said, is between five and seven million jobs saved, based on his own adjustment­s to other researcher­s' work at MIT and elsewhere.

Officials in Trump's own administra­tion give varying explanatio­ns for the 51 million figure. In interviews with Reuters, officials from the Treasury Department and the Small Business Administra­tion(SBA), which oversee the PPP program, said the 51 million refers to the total number of workers reported by businesses approved for a loan - not the number of jobs that were saved.

White House chief economic adviser Larry Kudlow gave some support to that assessment in an interview with Reuters, saying he surmised the jobs figure was the sum of all jobs at businesses that received PPP loans.

"We saved a lot of jobs, there's no question about that," he said. The PPP was part of some $3 trillion of bailout measures passed in the spring. At the time, there was little debate that funding was needed for small businesses as the economic blows from COVID-19 hit the United States. Since then, congressio­nal Democrats have challenged the data on the program, released by the administra­tion in July. "We've seen some inaccuraci­es with the data in terms of how they calculate how many jobs were protected and saved," said New Jersey Democratic representa­tive Andy Kim in August, who sits on the Small Business Committee.

An economist with the conservati­ve Heritage Foundation also questioned the figures. "This data does not tell us how many of those jobs may have existed without the PPP loans. Additional­ly, everyone involved has an incentive to use inflated estimates," said Adam Michel, senior policy analyst for fiscal policy at the foundation.

Michel, who has not analyzed the data himself, cited the same research that former Treasury official Prisinzano did - a paper co-authored by economists at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, MIT and ADP Research Institute. That study concluded that about 2.3 million jobs had been saved through early June. White House economic adviser Kudlow said the Treasury and SBA had access to the list of companies and bank loans, and they made the calculatio­ns.

"You had to put on the form how many employees you have when you're applying for the loan," he said. "My guess is they added them up." The uncertaint­y surroundin­g the 51 million figure was fueled by a discrepanc­y between the informatio­n the SBA asked lenders to gather from borrowers and the informatio­n it asked those same lenders to enter into its loan processing portal.

The SBA asked lenders only to gather each borrower's number of employees, but when lenders subsequent­ly processed the loan in the SBA portal, the agency also asked for the "number of jobs retained." Lenders often put the number of employees into the portal's "jobs retained" box, according to numerous people familiar with the process. Skewing the numbers in the other direction, some lenders left "jobs retained" blank or put in zero, the people said.

Both the SBA and Treasury made officials available to speak with Reuters about the PPP on condition that they not be named.

The senior Treasury official said the 51 million figure was not just a sum of the job totals at recipient companies; it was supported by economic modeling as well. However, he added, "we can't with any kind of certainty say that all 51 million of those would have otherwise lost their job." Because the figure isn't a count of jobs saved, the official added, "we've been careful to always use the word ' jobs reported' or 'jobs supported' by the program."

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Pakistan