The Pak Banker

Russia's Ukraine invasion sparks proxy world war

- Dov S. Zakheim

There is much to be said for the Biden administra­tion's latest $38 billion supplement­al request to Congress to help fund Ukraine's forces and its economy.

The request for yet another Ukraine supplement­al, the fourth since the Russian invasion that began on Feb. 24, of which $21.7 billion is for equipment and to replenish American stocks, would bring total American support for Ukraine to $104 billion.

In addition to this massive sum, the White House is seeking $7 billion in drawdown authority that would enable President Biden to transfer military materiel to Ukraine from America's dwindling stocks.

The administra­tion's request to what is now a lame-duck Congress reflects its sober calculatio­n that any additional requests to fund the Ukrainian war effort might not win easy congressio­nal approval in the divided Congress that will convene in January. No fewer than 57 members of the House and 11 senators,

Republican­s all, voted against the $40 billion Ukraine supplement­al that the Congress approved in May. An even larger number of House Republican­s - 201 - voted against the Sept. 30 Continuing Resolution that included $12.3 billion more for Kyiv.

An invigorate­d Republican right wing could render it exceedingl­y difficult for Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who is slated to become the next Speaker of the House, to muster passage for a fifth Ukraine supplement­al.

Given what is now certain to be a tiny Republican House majority, McCarthy would have to rely on Democratic votes to approve any further aid to Kyiv. Doing so, however, could well prompt a revolt in the House Republican caucus. McCarthy may not wish to tempt fate.

The current request could sustain the Ukrainian forces for some time; the funding approved in September has yet to be fully expended. If passed, the latest administra­tion request is not likely to be fully expended for several months into 2023. Moreover,

unless McCarthy were actively to block any further effort to fund Ukrainian needs, there would be a sufficient combinatio­n of Democratic and Republican votes in the House, whose Republican majority appears likely to be less than 10, to fund at least one more supplement­al in 2023.

Some of the funds from the latest Biden request could be applied immediatel­y to the transfer of tanks to Kyiv. Estimates for the time it would take to train the Ukrainians on M-1 tanks range from a few weeks to two months. Training Ukrainian troops now would ready them for operations when the roads freeze early next year and when Kyiv will sorely need additional armor.

In the meantime, other states also continue to support Ukraine, though clearly to a far lesser degree. Britain's new government remains committed to aiding Kyiv, despite the fact that its own military stocks have fallen to dangerousl­y low levels. Other NATO states are providing support, as are NATO candidates Sweden and Finland. Japan has transferre­d reconnaiss­ance drones and military gear of various types and South Korea is providing howitzers, artillery shells and tanks, indirectly via Poland and the United States.

Russia is

receiving

support from a coalition of its own, albeit a far smaller one. Belarus has enabled Russian forces to operate from its territory. Moscow has successful­ly recruited Syrian fighters and former Afghan special forces personnel. Finally, North Korea has been sending Russia shells from the vast stockpile that supports artillery aimed at the South, thereby parallelin­g the artillery support that Seoul is providing the Ukrainians.

From the start, the war between Russia and Ukraine has been more than a local conflict. Despite the absence of direct participat­ion of other states, the conflict neverthele­ss is in many ways a proxy world war, with what appears to be a subordinat­e proxy war between the two Koreas.

Many have derided President Biden's rhetoric regarding the "competitio­n" between autocracie­s and democracie­s. The RussoUkrai­nian conflict is demonstrat­ing the degree to which the contrast between the two forms of governance is far more than mere competitio­n.

 ?? ?? ‘‘Doing so, however, could well prompt a revolt in the House Republican caucus. McCarthy
may not wish to tempt fate. The current request could sustain the Ukrainian forces for
some time; the funding approved in September has yet to be fully expended.”
‘‘Doing so, however, could well prompt a revolt in the House Republican caucus. McCarthy may not wish to tempt fate. The current request could sustain the Ukrainian forces for some time; the funding approved in September has yet to be fully expended.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Pakistan