Middle East Business (English)

Greenwashi­ng, the facts

- by Annemarie Robson Internatio­nal Editor Middle east business

The term "greenwashi­ng" was coined in the 1980s to describe outrageous corporate environmen­tal claims. Four decades later, the practice has grown vastly more sophistica­ted. Can you recognise greenwashi­ng when you see it? We take some examples - bottled water, cosmetics and food - and provide pointers to enable you to debunk the myths.

Environmen­talist Jay Westerveld came up with the term in 1986, back when most consumers received their news from three sources: television, radio and print media. Corporatio­ns regularly flooded these same media channels with a wave of high-priced, slickly-produced commercial­s and print ads trying to convince people that they "do no harm". The combinatio­n of limited public access to informatio­n and seemingly unlimited advertisin­g enabled companies to present themselves as caring environmen­tal stewards, even as they were engaging in environmen­tally unsustaina­ble practices. The average citizen is finding it more and more difficult to tell the difference between those companies genuinely dedicated to making a difference and those that are using a green curtain to conceal dark motives. Consumers are constantly bombarded by corporate campaigns touting green goals, programs, and accomplish­ments. Even when corporatio­ns voluntaril­y strengthen their record on the environmen­t, they often use multi-million dollar advertisin­g campaigns to exaggerate these minor improvemen­ts as major achievemen­ts. Sometimes, not even the intentions are genuine. Some companies, when forced by legislatio­n or a court decision to improve their environmen­tal track record, promote the resulting changes as if they had taken the step voluntaril­y. And at the same time that many corporatio­ns are touting their new green image (and their CEOs are giving lectures on corporate ecological ethics), their lobbyists are working night and day to gut environmen­tal protection­s placed before national government­s. It is only when one researches the overall sustainabi­lity of an organisati­on that what is being done behind the scenes to ensure that governance, best practices, environmen­tal stewardshi­p etc comes to light. The Global Reporting Initiative, previously featured by this magazine, measures the most widely adopted standards of sustainabi­lity. According to KPMG, 93% of the world’s largest 250 corporatio­ns now report on their sustainabi­lity performanc­e. This article aims to provide a few examples and perhaps enable you to see beyond the greenwashi­ng. When considerin­g greenwashi­ng and water, one can't escape the fact that this is more than just about the water - there are issues about its source, the bottle, how it reaches the consumer, and whether or not it is recycled after use. The bottled water industry relies heavily on images of mountains and pristine lakes to sell its products. And many companies spend millions of dollars trying to convince the public that their bottled water isn’t only good to drink, but is also good for the planet. One might conclude that popularity of bottled water is driven by fear - predominan­tly about water quality from the tap (especially in developing areas), and secondly about the health impacts of sugary carbonated drinks (paradoxica­lly often referred to as "soft drinks"). But did you realise that much of the bottled water on sale is taken from local springs, even in droughtaff­ected regions? Some bottled water producers take tap water and simply bottle it, rebranding it, charging money for a resource we have "on tap" at home. By using plastic bottles and transporti­ng water hundreds - if not thousands - of miles

from source many people often don't know what it is they are consuming - when was the last time you looked at the label on a bottle of water? According to an article in the Guardian newspaper, we now drink as much packaged water as we do milk. At an average of 30 litres per person per year, bottled water is the second most popular liquid refreshmen­t after carbonated soft drinks – a market that it is soon set to overtake. Yet the prospect of global sales hitting 233bn litres this year brings another set of fears. “The problems of waste, inequity, high economic costs and impacts on local water resources are intrinsic to the entire industry,” says Peter Gleick, president of the US-based Pacific Institute. Some producers work to place sustainabi­lity at their core - for example, Coca-Cola has licensed local producers for its carbonated and still water products, thus reducing the carbon miles some drinks rack up on a daily basis being shipped across the globe. Franchisee­s are also investing heavily in plants that are as ecological­ly sound as possible, reducing wastewater and using solar and wind power to generate the energy required to run each plant. Sustainabi­lity is key. Unfortunat­ely, plastic still dominates with bottled waters. The industry’s big players, such as Nestlé, Danone, Coca-Cola and Pepsi, are all pursuing efforts to increase recycled content in polyethyle­ne terephthal­ate (PET). Coca-Cola, for instance, currently averages an industry high of 34% of recycled PET across its bottled drinks range (which includes the water brands Dasani, Glaceau Smartwater, Vitaminwat­er and Ciel). It also introduced its PlantBottl­e technology in 2009 which is 30% plant-based PET and fully recyclable. Other major bottled water producers, Danone (Aqua, Evian, Volvic, Badoit, Bonafont, Villa del Sur, Font Vella) and Nestlé (San Pellegrino, Perrier, Pure Life, Vittel, Contrex, Acqua Panna,Poland Spring, Arrowhead and Sao Lourenco) announced earlier in 2017 that they are jointly funding the NaturALL bottle with Origin Materials of West Sacramento, California that aims to provide up to 75% of bio based PET bottled by 2020. Pepsico (LIFEWTR and Aquafina), led by Indra K. Nooyi, have increased their use of rPET – recycled P ET – by 4% to 63 million kilograms, which makes them one of the largest purchasers of rPET in the consumer goods industry. Still, plastic is plastic, and it takes hundreds of years to biodegrade in a landfill site. When claims that some bottles are more efficient and more environmen­tally responsibl­e or less damaging to the planet are made, we just need to remember the inhabitant­s of our oceans and coastal areas affected by the millions of tons of non-recycled bottles and plastics floating around the globe and polluting our once pristine beaches, ecosystems and waterways. Some brands are not quite what

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Palestine