Business World

SC says price for NAIA 3 takeover final

- By Vince Alvic A. F. Nonato Reporter

BAGUIO CITY — The Supreme Court denied on Tuesday the government’s plea to reduce its payment to Philippine Internatio­nal Airport Terminals Co., Inc. (Piatco) for taking over the Ninoy Aquino Internatio­nal Airport Internatio­nal Passenger Terminal 3 (NAIA-IPT III) in Pasay City.

At the same time, the high court partially granted its motion for reconsider­ation by declaring that the terminal’s ownership “shall be vested in the Republic upon full payment of the just compensati­on…”

In its final summer en banc session this year, the court sustained as final the “just compensati­on” formula fixed by its Sept. 8, 2015 decision: a principal of $326.932 million less $ 59.439 million already paid in compliance with a 2005 SC ruling allowing the expropriat­ion of NAIA-IPT III, with the resulting difference of $267.494 million adding 12% annual interest from Sept. 11, 2006 to June 30, 2013 and 6% per annum from July 1, 2013 onwards.

Using this computatio­n, the ruling placed “just compensati­on” at $ 510.305 million as of Dec. 31, 2014.

SC Public Informatio­n Office Chief Theodore O. Te said in a briefing that the decision is final.

“No further pleadings will be allowed,” he said, adding that “entry of judgment should be made in due course.”

The government had earlier appealed the compensati­on set by the high court and said it should have to pay a total of just $104.52 million without interest.

It argued that a smaller compensati­on serves as “rectificat­ion” for Piatco’s failure to abide by the 1997 build-operate-and-transfer contract’s specificat­ions. The government also argued that Piatco should not be paid for lost income potential because the concession agreement for the NAIA-IPT III project was invalidate­d.

Besides partially granting the government’s motion insofar as full ownership is concerned, the high court also denied the appeal filed by Piatco, which had demanded a bigger principal of $470.45 million plus 12% interest per annum.

The SC also denied the motion for reconsider­ation filed by Piatco’s Japanese contractor­s, Takenaka Corp. and Asahikosan Corp., which sought compensati­on for building the facility. The court had earlier said that the fact that they built the building “does not make them the owner.”

The resolution was penned by Associate Justice Arturo D. Brion. Five magistrate­s — Chief Justice Maria Lourdes P.A. Sereno, as well as Associate Justices Antonio T. Carpio, Mariano C. del Castillo, Francis H. Jardeleza and Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa — inhibited from the case.

Communicat­ions Secretary Herminio B. Coloma, Jr. declined to comment on this developmen­t, saying: “We need to verify with the [Solicitor- General’s] office,” while Transporta­tion Secretary Joseph Emilio A. Abaya did not respond to requests for comment.

Initially, the Pasay City Regional Trial Court decided on $116.3 million in net compensati­on. The Court of Appeals in August 2013 raised this to $300.2 million plus 6% interest per annum from Sept. 11, 2006 onwards.

The NAIA- IPT III contract, awarded to Piatco in 1997 during the Ramos administra­tion, was declared irregular by the Arroyo government in 2002, the year the terminal should have become operationa­l. The Supreme Court voided the deal in 2003 and the government moved to take over the nearly completed facility a year later as compensati­on talks broke down. The terminal finally became operationa­l in 2008.

 ??  ?? NINOY Aquino Internatio­nal Airport Internatio­nal Passenger Terminal 3 opened nearly five years late in 2008.
NINOY Aquino Internatio­nal Airport Internatio­nal Passenger Terminal 3 opened nearly five years late in 2008.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines