Business World

Private Chinese companies worry Beijing is more focused on big state firms

-

BEIJING — An unpreceden­ted convergenc­e of economic stresses this year is weighing on China’s once vibrant private sector, compelling some entreprene­urs to question the effectiven­ess — and true intent — of Beijing’s policies.

Some of the millions of struggling private firms are worried Beijing is more focused on supporting giant state-owned enterprise­s (SOEs), even as China celebrates the 40th anniversar­y of landmark economic reforms that rekindled entreprene­urship in the communist country.

In a meeting with entreprene­urs aired on national TV last week, President Xi Jinping threw his backing behind private companies, pledging tax cuts and an equal business environmen­t for all firms. He also reaffirmed financial support for the sector.

But Mr. Xi also reiterated his defense of the state sector, saying reforms and tighter supervisio­n of state firms will help protect state assets that belong to all Chinese people.

“The long-term pressure will be very big, because it’s obvious that large enterprise­s will have more and more advantages, and small firms can only be ‘eaten up’ or go bankrupt,” said Bi Jiacheng, manager at Nantong Kunstronge­r Labor Protective Products Co., which makes protective gloves in eastern Jiangsu province.

“Private firms provide most jobs and stable taxes, that’s why the state needs to stabilize the private sector.”

With economic growth slowing and Beijing cracking down on riskier forms of borrowing, China’s private sector is grappling with a financing crunch that has pushed some firms into distress.

So far this year, at least 40 listed private firms have announced stake sales to state firms on the back of financial stresses worsened by the stock market rout, according to state media.

Private firms say they have also lost out to SOEs as environmen­tal inspectors shut small factories in the name of cutting pollution, while many exporters are vulnerable to the trade war with the United States.

Faced with uncertaint­ies, some private firms have chosen to maintain the status quo, rather than expand.

“Private enterprise­s should not consider ‘bigger and stronger,’ but consider ‘doing stronger in the middle,’ because if they are bigger, it’s necessary to consider the relationsh­ip between the state, society and government,” said Sam Yu, general manager at MENTECHS, a maker of industrial equipment in Jiangsu province’s Changzhou city.

One private ceramics manufactur­er said his firm was forced to relocate operations from Zibo in eastern Shandong province after a big industrial restructur­ing saw many local private firms shut down in a pollution and regulatory crackdown.

Another owner of a company supplying food to the transporta­tion industry complained his business had shrunk due to cannibaliz­ation from the state sector.

In the past, food for passengers was mainly manufactur­ed by private companies, but nowadays SOEs dominate he said, declining to be named for fear of retributio­n.

China’s State Council Informatio­n Office, the government’s public relations arm, and the Na- tional Developmen­t and Reform Commission, the top state planner, did not immediatel­y respond to Reuters’ requests for comment.

For much of the past three decades, private firms have flourished as China opened up its economy. Then in the last global financial crisis, SOEs staged a comeback thanks to Beijing’s massive stimulus — a shift popularly known as “the state sector advances, the private sector retreats.”

Vice-Premier Liu He said in October that talk of the advance of SOEs at the expense of private firms was “one-sided” and “wrong.”

State-owned banks and enterprise­s were helping and even restructur­ing private firms facing financial stress, he argued.

Given its focus on stability, Beijing does not want to see unhappines­s among private firms widening, potentiall­y galvanizin­g labor activism or strengthen­ing efforts at unionizati­on.

“China’s private economy can only grow and not be weakened. Not only can it not exit from the stage, it must move towards a bigger stage,” Mr. Xi said last week.

Policy makers have in recent months unveiled measures to lower financing costs, cut taxes and fast-track more infrastruc­ture projects, although analysts say such modest stimulus may take time to put a floor under the slowing economy.

China’s manufactur­ing sector barely grew in October, while the services sector crept close to the line that divides growth from contractio­n.

Last month, the central bank rolled out a programme to promote bond financing by private firms, after achieving limited success in channellin­g more credit to small firms via four reserve requiremen­t cuts this year.

While new bank loans have risen this year, other “shadow” lending has shrunk, weighing on the capacity of smaller private firms to grow and prosper.

“We can see some results in the short term given the central government has sent out strong signals and taken strong measures to support small and private firms,” said an adviser to the government.

“But this is not enough. Over the long term, we need to look at fundamenta­l ideas and fundamenta­l reforms — how to deal with the relationsh­ip between SOEs and private firms.” —

 ?? REUTERS ?? THE CITYSCAPE of the Beijing Central Business District is reflected on a pond at sunset in this Oct. 17 photo.
REUTERS THE CITYSCAPE of the Beijing Central Business District is reflected on a pond at sunset in this Oct. 17 photo.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines