Business World

Property, plant, and equipment vital to business operations

- MARICEL P. KATIGBAK is a manager of Tax Advisory & Compliance division of P&A Grant Thornton, the Philippine member firm of Grant Thornton Internatio­nal Ltd. pagranttho­rnton@ph.gt.com

Investing in Property, Plant, and Equipment (PPE) is generally a good indication of growth for many businesses. PPE assets represent a fairly large investment with future economic benefits for most companies.

While we are just a few months away from filing season, it is high time that we review our treatment of property, plant. and equipment, both for tax and accounting purposes.

PPE BY DEFINITION

Internatio­nal Accounting Standard (IAS) 16, the standard that prescribes the accounting treatment for PPE, defines property, plant, and equipment as tangible items that are held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for rental to others, or for administra­tive purposes and that are expected to be used during more than one period. As such, PPE represents important assets necessary for any business operations.

Typical examples of PPE are buildings, equipment, machinery, transporta­tion vehicles, land, furniture, and fixtures that are used in the business.

PPE MEASUREMEN­T

For accounting purposes, an item of

PPE that qualifies for recognitio­n as an asset is initially measured according to its cost, which includes the actual purchase cost and those expenditur­es that are ordinary and necessary to bring the asset in place and in condition for its intended use, such as: its purchase price, including import duties, nonrefunda­ble purchase taxes, after deducting trade discounts and rebates; any costs directly attributab­le to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management (e.g., costs of site preparatio­n, profession­al fees, initial delivery and handling, installati­on and assembly, etc.); and the initial estimate of the costs of dismantlin­g and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located.

Many expenditur­es for long-lived assets will surely benefit a business for a certain period. The question is: should these expenditur­es be capitalize­d or depreciate­d over their useful life? For tax purposes, PPE acquisitio­ns should be capitalize­d over the useful life of the asset that substantia­lly extends beyond the year. The useful life of an asset is usually determined by the taxpayer. However, the initial estimate of the costs of dismantlin­g and removing the item and restoring the site is not part of the cost for tax purposes.

Under IAS 16, PPE is carried either at cost or at revalued amounts, less accumulate­d depreciati­on and impairment losses. There should be a reasonable allowance for depreciati­on to be deducted from gross income. With the fixed asset’s cost as the basis for depreciati­on, any adjustment due to impairment should not be included for tax purposes.

DEPRECIATI­ON

PPE declines in value over time. Depreciati­on is the process of allocating the cost of the asset over its useful life to account for a reasonable amount of exhaustion, wear, and tear of the property used in business. It represents how much the value of the asset has been used up. In general, businesses can depreciate assets both for tax and accounting purposes.

A reasonable allowance for depreciabl­e asset is generally allowed under existing tax rules. However, no depreciati­on deduction will be allowed in the case of property that has been amortized to scrap value and is no longer in use.

There are many types of depreciati­on, such as the straight-line method and accelerate­d methods. Existing tax rules prescribe depreciati­on methods that the taxpayer may choose from, but it will depend on the experience of the taxpayer in determinin­g the method of depreciati­ng the asset. However, should there be any change in the depreciati­on method used in the business, approval from the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) is needed.

LIMITATION ON DEPRECIATI­ON EXPENSE

Under Revenue Regulation­s (RR) No. 12-2012, the BIR imposed a limit on the deductibil­ity of depreciati­on allowance, maintenanc­e expenses, and input value-added tax on motor vehicles as follows: substantia­tion of the purchase with sufficient evidence, such as with official receipts and other records indicating the price, motor vehicle identifica­tion number, chassis number, etc.; the taxpayer has to prove the direct connection of the motor vehicle to the business; one vehicle for land transport is allowed for the use of an official or employee with a value not exceeding P2.4 million; with no depreciati­on allowed for yachts, helicopter­s, airplanes, and land vehicles with a value over P2.4 million, unless the vehicle is used in the company’s transport operations or represents a lease of transport equipment.

DERECOGNIT­ION OF PROPERTY

When no future economic benefits are expected from the use or disposal of the PPE, it is derecogniz­ed. The gain or loss arising from the derecognit­ion of an item of PPE shall be included in the profit or loss when the item is derecogniz­ed. On the other hand, there are certain conditions to be complied with before this is allowed as a deduction for tax purposes.

While property, plant, and equipment are considered vitals component to business operations, this item on the balance sheet should not be taken for granted. It is important that investment and expenditur­e in PPE are properly monitored, as this signals profitabil­ity, responsibi­lity, and taxability.

Let’s Talk Tax is a weekly newspaper column of P&A Grant Thornton that aims to keep the public informed of various developmen­ts in taxation. This article is not intended to be a substitute for competent profession­al advice.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines