BusinessMirror

Pelosi waves off impeachmen­t, says it would divide the country

-

WASHINGTON—House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is setting a high bar for the impeachmen­t of President Donald J. Trump, saying he is “just not worth it,” even as some on her left flank clamor to start proceeding­s.

Pelosi said in an interview with The Washington Post that “I’m not for impeachmen­t” of Trump.

“Unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelmi­ng and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country,” she said.

While she has made similar comments before, Pelosi is making it clear to her caucus and to voters that Democrats will not move forward quickly with trying to remove Trump from office. And it’s a departure from her previous comments that Democrats are waiting on special counsel Robert Mueller to lay out findings from his Russia investigat­ion before considerin­g impeachmen­t.

That thinking among Democrats has shifted, slightly, in part because of the possibilit­y that Mueller’s report will not be decisive and because his investigat­ion is more narrowly focused. Instead, House Democrats are pursuing their own broad, high-profile investigat­ions that will keep the focus on Trump’s business dealings and relationsh­ip with Russia, exerting

congressio­nal oversight without having to broach the I-word.

Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings, one of the lawmakers leading those investigat­ions, said he agrees with Pelosi, and Congress needs “to do our homework.” He said impeachmen­t “has to be a bipartisan effort, and right now it’s not there.”

“I get the impression this matter will only be resolved at the polls,” Cummings said.

Still, Pelosi’s comments are certain to stoke a stubborn tension with those who believe impeachmen­t proceeding­s should have begun on day one of the new Congress. Some new freshman Democrats who hail from solidly liberal districts haven’t shied away from the subject—Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib used a vulgarity in calling for Trump’s impeachmen­t the day she was sworn in.

Billionair­e activist Tom Steyer, who is bankrollin­g a campaign pushing for Trump’s impeachmen­t, shot back at Pelosi on Monday: “Speaker Pelosi thinks ‘he’s just not worth it?’ Well, is defending our legal system ‘worth it?’ Is holding the president accountabl­e for his crimes and coverups ‘worth it?’ Is doing what’s right ‘worth it?’ Or shall America just stop fighting for our principles and do what’s politicall­y convenient?”

Neil Sroka of the liberal advocacy group Democracy for America said Pelosi’s comments were “a little like an oncologist taking chemothera­py off the table before she’s even got your test results back.”

Other lawmakers who have called for impeachmen­t looked at Pelosi’s comments more practicall­y. Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who filed articles of impeachmen­t against Trump on the first day of the new Congress in January, acknowledg­ed that there is not yet public support for impeachmen­t, but noted that Pelosi “didn’t say ‘I am against it if the public is clamoring for it.’”

Sherman said that the multiple Democratic investigat­ions of Trump might be a substitute for impeachmen­t, “it’s also possible it will be a prelude.”

Republican­s alternatel­y praised Pelosi and were skeptical. White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said “I agree” in response to Pelosi’s words.

Sanders added of impeachmen­t, “I don’t think it should have ever been on the table.”

House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy said it was a “smart thing for her to say,” but Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, the top Republican on the Judiciar y Committee, said he doesn’t think it’s “going to fly” with some of Pelosi’s members.

“I do believe what Speaker Pelosi understand­s is that what they’re wanting to do is going to require far more than what they have now, so I think they are hedging their bet on it,” Collins said.

Pelosi has long resisted calls to impeach the president, saying it’s a “divisive” issue that should only be broached with “great care.”

She refused calls when she first held the speaker’s gavel, in 2007, to start impeachmen­t proceeding­s against George W. Bush. Having been a member of Congress during President Bill Clinton’s impeachmen­t, she saw the way the public turned on Republican­s and helped Clinton win a second term. Heading into the midterm elections, she discourage­d candidates from talking up impeachmen­t, preferring to stick to the kitchen-table issues that she believes most resonate with voters.

Pelosi has often said the House should not pursue impeachmen­t for political reasons, but it shouldn’t hold back for political reasons, either. Rather, she says, the investigat­ions need to take their course and impeachmen­t, if warranted, will be clear.

Freshman Democrats who are from more moderate districts and will have to win reelection again in two years have been fully supportive of Pelosi’s caution.

“When we have something that’s very concrete, and we have something that is compelling enough to get a strong majority of Americans, then we’ll do it,” said Rep. Katie Hill, D-Calif. “But if it’s going to be a political disaster for us, then we’re not going to do it.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines