BusinessMirror

Deductibil­ity of loss from destructio­n of inventorie­s/assets

-

off/destroyed inventorie­s as deductions. But that is not necessary and certainly not the only means. Some other reliable proofs, other than selfservin­g pronouncem­ent by the taxpayer, would serve the same purpose.

Even the issuance of Revenue Memorandum Order 16-2012 was vague on this requiremen­t. Although the RMO prescribed the policies and guidelines for the required physical/ ocular inspection and supervisio­n over the destructio­n/disposal of equipment or of inventory of goods or assets which have been declared, among others, as waste or obsolete due to different causes rendering the same unfit for sale or for use in production, before it can be considered as deductible, it was referring to casualty losses. The term “casualty” is the complete or partial destructio­n of property resulting from an identifiab­le event of a sudden, unexpected, or unusual nature. It does not apply to losses arising from ordinary deteriorat­ion of assets from operating causes. Also, it was referring to cases where the inventorie­s, machinerie­s or equipment applied for destructio­n are located outside the territoria­l jurisdicti­on of the BIR office where the taxpayer is registered. It would seem that it did not cover goods/assets located within the jurisdicti­on of the BIR office where the taxpayer is registered.

The confusion on the requiremen­ts for the deductibil­ity of losses arising from destructio­n/disposal had come to light with the recent issuance of RMO 21-2020. Prescribin­g the policies, guidelines and procedures for the inspection or supervisio­n of the destructio­n/disposal and determinat­ion of deductible expense pertaining to inventory of goods/ assets which have been declared as waste or obsolete, the RMO requires an applicatio­n for destructio­n/disposal of goods/assets to be filed with and processed by the concerned BIR office where the principal place of business of the taxpayer is registered. An applicatio­n has to be filed at least seven days before the proposed scheduled date of destructio­n/disposal of the inventorie­s/equipment.

Among other documentar­y and procedural compliance, the new RMO also requires actual witnessing of the destructio­n of a representa­tive of the BIR, who must later issue a Certificat­e of Deductibil­ity. Interestin­gly, an accredited tax practition­er or external auditor may also be a witness. The certificat­e issued by the witness shall be the basis of the taxpayer in claiming deductions. Clearly, before a loss is recognized as a deduction, it is now mandatory for a BIR authorized representa­tive to witness the actual destructio­n of inventorie­s and other kinds of assets and to issue certificat­ion on his observatio­n.

With this new RMO, there is now clarity on the requiremen­ts before a loss on inventorie­s and assets which have become waste or obsolete due to spoilage, deteriorat­ion, obsolescen­ce, expiration, or other causes rendering the asset unfit for sale or for use in production. Taxpayers should follow the guidelines provided in the RMO, with the certificat­e issued by the BIR as the primary document to support a claim for deduction. Taxpayers cannot rely on other documents to substantia­te their deductions, no matter how significan­t such other documents are. These may only serve as additional proofs. But compliance with these requiremen­ts applies only to losses resulting from actual destructio­n and not to other reasons. Certainly, it does not apply to losses from sale of inventorie­s and assets sold at less than their carrying values.

The author is a partner of Du-baladad and Associates Law Offices (BDB Law), a member-firm of WTS Global.

The article is for general informatio­n only and is not intended, nor should be construed as a substitute for tax, legal or financial advice on any specific matter. Applicabil­ity of this article to any actual or particular tax or legal issue should be supported therefore by a profession­al study or advice. If you have any comments or questions concerning the article, you may e-mail the author at fulvio.dawilan@ bdblaw.com.ph or call 8403-2001 loc 310.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines