BusinessMirror

Permanent job losses pose trouble for economic recovery

- By Brian Chappatta

2013. The sharp growth in permanent job losers screeched to a halt in July, in what was seen as an encouragin­g sign about the path forward for the labor market. Friday’s figures are a stark reminder that the damage caused by the coronaviru­s pandemic is still making its way through the economy. The US has yet to reach an equilibriu­m.

For reference, there were 13.55 million unemployed workers in the US labor force in August, meaning about 25 percent consider themselves permanentl­y jobless. By contrast, when unemployme­nt peaked after the last recession in late 2009 at 15.35 million, about 6.82 million were deemed permanent job losers, or roughly 45 percent. On a percentage basis, August marked the sharpest increase in that ratio on record.

This relationsh­ip will be worth watching in the months ahead as the US claws out from the pandemic. Already in the past few weeks, companies including large airlines, Ford Motor Co. and Bed

Bath & Beyond have announced plans to cut workers. At its current pace, the US would approach 2009-level permanent unemployme­nt, at least relative to the total jobless, by the end of the year. That’s when the hardest part of building back the American economy will begin in earnest. Of course, the jobs data as a whole was encouragin­g and trending in the right direction, which explains why Treasuries sold off, with the benchmark 10-year yield increasing by 5 basis points to 0.68 percent. Still, if the worst rout in US equities since June can be called a “healthy correction,” I’d say the same thing for the world’s biggest bond market. The 10-year yield is still poised to end the week about 4 basis points lower than it started it. Shorter-term notes still indicate that traders expect the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates near zero for many years to come.

More urgently, however, the increase in the permanentl­y unemployed keeps the pressure on Washington lawmakers who are still squabbling over another fiscal relief bill. The supplement­al $600 in weekly unemployme­nt benefits and small-business aid from previous legislatio­n has expired. If the sudden spike in unemployme­nt was only temporary, and permanent job losses leveled off, then it’s possible the first stimulus might have been enough. Friday’s data makes clear that the US labor market is not yet on solid footing. At what point the fallout ends is anyone’s guess—but additional aid would undoubtedl­y soften the blow.

“The end of most pandemic aid is one wrinkle to closely watch going forward,” Chris Low at FHN Financial wrote. “In August, it may have boosted job growth as people had a strong incentive to find work. Later this year, it may have the opposite effect if spending weakens.”

Only in the throes of a worldwide pandemic can a significan­tly lower-thanexpect­ed US unemployme­nt rate raise so many questions. It’s not an all-clear by any stretch.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines