BusinessMirror

Making the hybrid workplace fair

- By Mark Mortensen & Martine Haas Mark Mortensen is an associate professor of organizati­onal behaviour at INSEAD. Martine Haas is the Lauder chair professor of management at the Wharton School.

THE pandemic has upended much about the way we work. What comes next is neither the death of the office nor a return to the way things were. Instead, our new reality will be a hybrid: Some employees will be in the same physical space, while others will work remotely.

Hybrid working arrangemen­ts promise organizati­ons the benefits of remote working (increased flexibilit­y, a reduced carbon footprint, labor-cost optimizati­on and increased employee satisfacti­on) along with the critical strengths of traditiona­l, co-located work (smoother coordinati­on, informal networking, stronger cultural socializat­ion, greater creativity and face-to-face collaborat­ion). But such arrangemen­ts will inevitably create power differenti­als within teams that can damage relationsh­ips, impede effective collaborat­ion and ultimately reduce performanc­e.

Hybrid work arrangemen­ts mean that employees will have different access to resources and different levels of visibility — both key sources of power and influence. Employees in the office have ready and quick access to technology and infrastruc­ture to support their work. They tend to have faster and easier access to informatio­n, and that informatio­n tends to be more current, which provides them with an edge when it comes to facing the rapid changes of today’s work environmen­t. Being in the office also provides workers with access to the emotional support provided by peers.

In contrast, employees who work remotely often find that their weaker technologi­cal setup and infrastruc­ture (slow connection­s, inability to access certain resources from home, a less sophistica­ted home office setup) makes it more difficult to demonstrat­e competence. Not being present for informal interactio­ns leaves remote workers feeling out of the loop. Being remote may also lead employees to feel more isolated and lacking in the relationsh­ips and connection­s that provide social support.

A person's visibility, or the ability to be seen by those in power, is also shaped by an employee’s location. Working in the same space as their boss increases the likelihood that employees’ efforts and actions will be recognized. Employees who are seen in the hallways are likely to come to mind when it’s time to staff an important new project, and their actions on that project are likely to be recognized, resulting in credit for a job well done. Even if the boss is working remotely, when an employee is based in the office, it increases the likelihood that person's actions will be seen by others and reported to the boss. When working remotely, no one sees the late nights or early mornings employees are working to deliver on their obligation­s. Credit for a collective output is likely to be unevenly attributed most to those who are there in the office and more visible.

Managers are also confronted with challenges in hybrid settings. While employees need to ensure that they’re visible to their managers and can access the resources they need for their work, managers need to make sure that they stay informed about what their employees are doing and facilitate their access to those resources. Managers who are colocated with their employees tend to have more informatio­n about what and how those employees are doing, while managers who work remotely and are far from their employees may feel like they’re operating in the dark.

In short, hybrid work models are a real threat to fairness. Here are four ways managers can address manage the structural­ly inevitable difference­s in power that arise in a hybrid environmen­t:

Track and communicat­e:

Create an accurate map of your team’s “hybrid configurat­ion”: who is working where, and when. Once you’ve mapped this out, you need to have a conversati­on with the individual employees to bring to the surface the challenges they face and discuss what you can do to overcome them. Always bear in mind that your employees’ resource access depends on their location, and their visibility depends on their location relative to you.

Design:

While some degree of power imbalance is structural­ly inevitable in a hybrid team, when necessary and possible managers should intervene to redistribu­te power by shifting access to resources and visibility levels. Policies and procedures should also be revisited regularly to ensure they don’t provide an unfair advantage based on the power imbalance—such as when key performanc­e indicators don’t align with resource accessibil­ity or evaluation­s don’t account for difference­s in visibility levels.

Educate: Many issues don't arise solely from hybrid work arrangemen­ts; the real problem is the lack of awareness of the power imbalances it creates. To effectivel­y manage in hybrid environmen­ts, managers must promote awareness of the issues in question and educate employees and themselves on how to avoid bias. Particular­ly important is establishi­ng a culture of psychologi­cal safety and trust.

Monitor: With this understand­ing in mind, it’s important that managers keep an eye out for key interventi­on moments. Through our discussion­s with executives, we’ve identified a number of key opportunit­ies to address the potential challenges of hybrid work as far as power dynamics are concerned:

1. Performanc­e reviews and evaluation­s

MANAGERS must remain acutely aware of how hybrid work arrangemen­ts create an imbalance in relations to employees’ access to resources and visibility levels. Performanc­e evaluation­s present an opportunit­y for managers and employees to review and discuss imbalances and how to address them going forward.

2. Team launches

HYBRID teams start with team members who are not on the same footing. Team launches are an opportunit­y for managers and team members to recognize, acknowledg­e and discuss power difference­s and to decide how collective­ly to manage them.

3. Onboarding

HOW can managers bring people into the organizati­on when not everyone can physically come to the office? How can they put their new remote hires on a comparable footing to those who are brought into a face-to-face office environmen­t? The effect of hybrid work models on group dynamics needs to be incorporat­ed into onboarding sessions and discussion­s.

For companies to reap the many benefits of hybrid working, managers must be aware of the power dynamics at play. It’s critical that they develop an understand­ing of them and take steps to level the playing field for their teams.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines