Daily Tribune (Philippines)

A corporatio­n’s new lease of life

- Eduardo Martinez

In legal parlance, the corporatio­n is a person. A juridical person that is. Thus it has an existence entirely separate and distinct from its owners, the stockholde­rs. Just like a real person, it can enter into transactio­ns with anyone. It purchases and owns assets and properties, inasmuch the same way we humans do. In like manner, it can incur its own debts and liabilitie­s. And these will have to be settled by the corporatio­n itself; not by the stockholde­rs that compose it. Clearly, the corporatio­n lives, breathes and exists on its own.

But just like humans, corporatio­ns die too. And based on the (old) Corporatio­n Code (Batas Pambansa 68), a corporatio­n is to live only for fifty years (subject to extension prior to its death). The Revised Corporatio­n Code, Republic Act 11232 (which took effect on 23 February 2019), now has amended this to make corporatio­ns exist in perpetuity. The new provision on existence notwithsta­nding, many corporatio­ns, for one reason or the other, have died. And supposedly under the law, when its term of existence has reached its end, the corporatio­n, for all intents and purposes ceases to breathe. And just like a real person, when the corporatio­n dies, its assets and liabilitie­s must be liquidated; akin to the settlement of the estate of a deceased person.

“But

unlike humans, a corporatio­n can be raised back from the dead, and exist in the very same person it was prior to its death. This is one salient feature of a corporatio­n.

In this manner, a corporatio­n, save for a brief moment of death, can continue to exist and this time in perpetuity. With this, it is as if the corporatio­n never died at all.

But unlike humans, a corporatio­n can be raised back from the dead, and exist in the very same person it was prior to its death. This is one salient feature of a corporatio­n our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) introduced quite recently, 21 November 2019 to be exact. I invite you to read SEC Memorandum Circular 23, Series of 2019. It states that “a corporatio­n whose term has expired… may apply for a revival of its corporate existence, together with all the rights and privileges under its certificat­e of incorporat­ion and subject to all its duties, debts and liabilitie­s existing prior to its revival.”(3rd Whereas clause, SEC Memo Circular 23). Call it a corporatio­n’s new lease of life. Before the Revised Corporatio­n Code, things would go practicall­y haywire when a corporatio­n continues to exist past its life. There have been instances before when the officers of the corporatio­n failed to extend its fifty-year term, thus creating a vacuum. An absurd situation arises — a corporatio­n existing in fact, but already non-existent in law. If likened to a human, it is like a dead person still actually mingling and transactin­g with his peers? Impossible, right?

So as to remedy this hiatus, the SEC came up with the circular mentioned above. All that is entailed is for its interested persons to file a petition for revival of the corporatio­n. The SEC hears the petition and grants opportunit­y for others to oppose it. If it finds the petition meritoriou­s, over the others’ objections, it restores the corporatio­n to its exact state, prior to how it was when it died. Thus, it reacquires its rights and privileges. And at the same time, it is made answerable to its liabilitie­s existent prior to death. So in this manner, a corporatio­n, save for a brief moment of death, can continue to exist and this time in perpetuity. With this, it is as if the corporatio­n never died at all. Business is not disrupted. Transactio­ns continue. Laudable “corporate medical science,” is it not?

If only there is a way of reviving a deceased real person too, like that of a corporatio­n; that would be fantabulou­s. But that of course my dear readers, only God can do. Amen.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines