Daily Tribune (Philippines)

Socmed monitoring for terrorists only, AFP clarifies

- BY KRISTINA MARALIT @tribunephl_tina

Armed Forces of the Philippine­s (AFP) Chief Lt. Gen. Gilbert Gapay’s suggestion to regulate social media use under the controvers­ial Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) was meant to keep track of terrorists, not to curtail the right to freedom of expression.

By regulating, Gapay meant putting the use of socmed to order, that is, to ensure that the terrorists will not be able to use it as a convenient but potent means “to advance the ends of terrorism, recruit new members, and generate financial, logistical, and material support,” AFP spokesman, Maj. Gen. Edgard Arevalo, said in a statement on Wednesday.

But even this is difficult to regulate because it is undergroun­d and operates illegally.

Gapay merely shared his views as the military will be among those who will help craft the implementi­ng rules and regulation­s of the ATA of 2020.

The comments, insisted Arevalo, also stemmed from Gapay’s experience in fighting terrorists in Mindanao, particular­ly in Marawi City, as well as from his observatio­ns from other countries’ approach in battling terrorism and violent extremism.

Gapay drew criticisms after saying that the use of social media must be regulated to stop radicalism and radicaliza­tion of the youth as cyberspace “is the platform now being used by terrorists to radicalize, to recruit and even plan terrorist acts” and that the military also “will have some recommenda­tions on how the law may be implemente­d.”

Arevalo assured that the stand of the AFP chief will always be “subject to constituti­onal limitation­s, existing laws and regulation­s.”

“The AFP assures the public that it will not curtail and instead protect the people’s right to free speech, assembly, and redress of grievances as enshrined in the Constituti­on,” Arevalo noted.

Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana, in a separate statement, guaranteed that regulating social media use is not mandated by the controvers­ial law against terror nor “it would violate freedom of speech and discourse.”

Lorenzana also defended Gapay, whom he said was only trying to convey that the AFP, as the main body tasked to fight terrorism in the country, is mulling suggesting diving into the dark side of internet where clandestin­e networks peddle drugs, traffic people, sell guns and explosives, hire assassins, engage in illegal activities, and recruit terrorists and plan terroristi­c acts.

“But even this is difficult to regulate because it is undergroun­d and operates illegally. Also being used to recruit and plan terroristi­c acts,” Lorenzana said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines