Daily Tribune (Philippines)

ERC mus call shots fairly

- ATTY. MELVIN ALVAREZ MATIBAG

I was watching the recently downloaded videos of Congressma­n Dan Fernandez of Sta. Rosa City, Laguna in YouTube — (1) Committee on Energy: Briefing on Electricit­y Market and Power Transmissi­on and (2) Committee on Energy Organizati­onal Meeting.

These contained video clips of two separate meetings of the House Committee on Energy held two months ago. In both videos, Congressma­n Dan accuses the officials of the Energy Regulatory Commission of not only abandoning their legal duty to protect the interests of Filipino consumers. They are also enablers of the oppression of electricit­y consumers by the non-computatio­n of the weighted average cost of capital or WACC for the past seven years.

WACC represents the average rate that a company expects to pay to finance its assets. In the case of the National Grid Corporatio­n of the Philippine­s, Congressma­n Dan asserts that its WACC should not be higher than 8 percent, but the ERC omitted to review NGCP’s WACC since 2015 which was pegged at 15.04 percent. Instead of reviewing the rates, the ERC gave NGCP an iMAR or the Interim Maximum Allowable Revenue (profits) from the previous P43.1 billion in 2015 to P43.8 billion yearly (2016-2020) and another round of increase in profits of P3.3 Billion in February 2020 at the onset of the Coronaviru­s pandemic.

The issue on WACC raised by Congressma­n Dan is a typical pitfall of a traditiona­l monopoly system instituted in the Electric Power Industry Reform Act or EPIRA Law. The EPIRA rode with the wave of privatizat­ion of the 90s and the 2000s, which unfortunat­ely also led to the government surrenderi­ng the System Operation of the power grid to a private corporatio­n. (I always considered the SO as an important symbol of sovereignt­y that can’t be dealt with commercial­ly, or abandoned by the government.)

Privatizat­ion relatively worked in highly developed countries but it’s a different case for the Philippine­s where our regulatory institutio­ns are weak. Let us imagine that the Electricit­y Transmissi­on Sector is a game and the participan­ts are the ERC (as the referee), Team NGCP (private interest in a monopoly business), and the Team Filipino consumers (public interest):

In the WACC game, Congressma­n Dan effectivel­y (passionate­ly, too) demonstrat­ed to us that the Team Filipino consumers got screwed over by the referee(s). In reply to Congressma­n Dan’s question on why the ERC — Regulatory Operations Service, the department tasked to do the rate-setting, failed to compute the WACC for seven years when they were mandated to review it in 2016, the officers simply pointed to the Commission or the Board itself for not promulgati­ng the rules for rate-setting. It was as if it was a minor issue without consequenc­es to the Filipino consumers that was simply overlooked and then proceeded to point fingers at the Head referee and its board for their inaction.

The WACC game is just a one-game, among thousands of games that the ERC gets to officiate. It’s a very difficult task to be a referee for the games in the electricit­y sector. That’s why the legislatur­e made it a high-paying job. The ERC, its chairman, the commission­ers, and employees are given above-rate compensati­on and are exempted from the Salary Standardiz­ation Law; with the ERC chairman enjoying the same compensati­on and benefits as that of the Supreme Court chief justice, and the commission­ers, equal to that of the associate justices.

ERC as the referee should be guided by the standard of providing Filipino consumers with cheap and quality electricit­y. The Filipino household electricit­y rates are among the highest in Asia, comparable to the Japanese household, but do we get the same quality of electricit­y, or even just near it? If not, then obviously we are being overcharge­d.

Fortunatel­y, The Team Filipino consumers are, in my opinion, in good hands with the new ERC Chairman and CEO, Atty. Monalisa Dimalanta. We expect her to call every game with fairness and neutrality and break away from the system (characteri­zed by arbitrarin­ess and capricious­ness) solidified since the non-computatio­n of WACC.

“Privatizat­ion relatively worked in highly developed countries but it’s a different case for the Philippine­s where our regulatory institutio­ns are weak.

“The Filipino household electricit­y rates are among the highest in Asia, comparable to the Japanese household, but do we get the same quality of electricit­y, or even just near it?

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines