Inequality worst in decades in range of countries — OECD

PARIS, France (AFP) — The gap between the rich and poor in a range of countries has reached its widest in 30 years and the trend has harmed growth, the OECD said Tuesday.

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) said in a new report that most of its 34 member countries had seen a growing widening in the inequality gap.

“In most OECD countries, the gap between rich and poor is at its highest level since 30 years,” the report said.

“Today, the richest 10 percent of the population in the OECD area earn 9.5 times the income of the poorest 10 percent; in the 1980s this ratio stood at 7:1 and has been rising continuously ever since.”

The OECD counts both developed and developing countries as members, including nations from the European Union as well as the United States, Turkey, Mexico, and Japan. China, Brazil, and India are not members.

In the couple of decades leading up to the global economic crisis, average household income grew for all OECD countries by about 1.6 percent annually.

“However, in three quarters of OECD countries, household incomes of the top 10 percent grew faster than those of the poorest 10 percent, resulting in widening income inequality,” the report said.

During the recent post-crisis years, average household income stagnated or fell in most member countries, it said.

The gap between the rich and poor varies widely across OECD member states and is often narrower in many Continental European nations and the Nordic countries, according to the report.

But the average income ratio between the richest 10 percent and the poorest 10 percent skyrockets in other member states.

It “reaches around 10 to 1 in Italy, Japan, Korea, Portugal, and the United Kingdom, between 13 and 16 to 1 in Greece, Israel, Turkey, and the United States, and between 27 and 30 to 1 in Mexico and Chile.”

The report argues that expanding income inequality has negatively affected the economies of member countries, estimating that it has knocked more than 10 percentage points off growth in Mexico and New Zealand.

“In the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Finland, and Norway, the growth rate would have been more than one fifth higher had income disparities not widened,” it said.

At the same time, according to the OECD’s calculations, greater equality helped boost GDP per capita in Spain, France, and Ireland prior to the economic crisis.

The report called for anti-poverty programs along with increased access to high-quality education, training, and healthcare.

“The paper also finds no evidence that redistributive policies, such as taxes and social benefits, harm economic growth, provided these policies are well designed, targeted, and implemented,” the OECD said in a statement announcing the report.

“Thank you so much for writing about those ‘rolling coffins,’ a topic hardly ever discussed because, as you write, people take it for granted that this is a tradition that remains with us. Even the LTO would not raise a bar in the interest of public health. Why then do drivers present emission test rating when nobody ever seems to FAIL?”

PAG ASA is more accurate

Our country’s top weather station is in a better position to accurately predict the path of “Ruby” after modern facilities were bought and installed since June 30, 2010. The weather sta-

Lack of credentials Years ago a popular TV weather forecaster made it his business to disagree with PAG-ASA’s prediction of a typhoon’s landfall by listing his own corrections. One senior government weather official said they were not ready to discuss the weather with the TV forecaster for two reasons: 1) the popular TV forecaster had a bachelor’s degree in commerce from a downtown college, and 2) his weather forecast was also based on PAGASA’s warnings of the week.

Nature fights pollution

If given the right wind speed, our country is blessed with a climate that can minimize or abolish air pollution. From January to March, the northeasterly (amihan), a wind blow-

Overcrowding in cities The idyllic countryside of the 1960s in Luzon cannot be found anymore between Bulacan and Baguio. If the government has the means to replace buses/jeeps with efficient rail transport it has the effect of solving three problems: monstrous traffic, air pollution, and overcrowding in cities. In Europe, employees and workers live in villages 30 to 50 miles from their workplace in cities. But trains are efficient that in 30 minutes they’re either in their homes or in their offices.

Here a bus ride from Bulacan, Cavite, or Laguna can take us three/four hours to reach our workplace/offices. Going home after 5p.m. can become an ordeal. If an employee loses five hours daily to uncomfortable bus rides, can efficiency be expected from him? ( Comments are welcome at roming@pefianco.com).