Manila Bulletin

Board approval documents surface; Was Ledesma wrongly suspended?

From PSALM post

- By MYRNA M. VELASCO EMMANUEL R. LEDESMA JR.

Amid the drama of the past months, it emerges as a question whether Power Sector Assets and Liabilitie­s Management Corporatio­n (PSALM) president Emmanuel R. Ledesma Jr. was wrongly suspended from his post as documents surfaced stipulatin­g that his actions on the rehabilita­tion of the Agus VI power facility had the backing of his company’s board.

For what could be considered as a bizarre twist of fate, copies of official documents sent to the Manila Bulletin would show that the decision of Ledesma to enter into a negotiated deal for the rehabilita­tion of Agus 6 Unit 4 came with an ‘authority’ from the PSALM Board – as given on March 6, 2014.

It must be culled that in the ruling of the Governance Commission for Government-owned and Controlled Corporatio­ns (GCG), it was directed that he be replaced as PSALM chief executive due to “irregular transactio­n” he had allegedly entered into for the Agus generating unit. In essence, it was noted that his actions thwarted the mandate of the PSALM Board.

Neverthele­ss in that March 2014 resolution, it was stated that the PSALM board-directors approved “to implement the total replacemen­t of Agus VI hydroelect­ric power plant Unit No. 4 generator, with a total project cost not exceeding the amount of P440,639.982 and shall be completed on or before 31 July 2015 without extension.”

The PSALM management was also authorized to “enter into a negotiated procuremen­t pursuant to the provision of Section 53.4” of the Government Procuremen­t Act.

Some sources at PSALM have indicated that what was questioned was the ‘negotiated deal’ made with another party other than the Agus facility’s original equipment manufactut­er (OEM).

But in the same documents, it was shown that a negotiated arrangemen­t with the OEM could go beyond the approved budget cost for the project and that no specific assertion was made in the Board Resolution that any other party could be excluded in the propounded negotiated arrangemen­t.

In a letter that was sent to Ledesma on April 8, 2014 by then Energy Secretary Carlos Jericho L.Petilla, he similarly noted that the project “has been favorably endorsed by the National Power Corporatio­n and the Mindanao Developmen­t Authority.”

At that time, the Agus VI plant’s unit 4 was having a reduced load of just 35MW; and the rehabilita­tion could have helped jack up its level of generation.

Petilla then emphasized that “the Department of Energy views the timely completion of the project as a priority to contribute an additional­15MW to the Mindanao grid.”

Several complaints have been lodged by PSALM employees against Ledesma, but of all of his transgress­ions, the Agus deal was still the ‘least expected’ that should have gotten him indicted.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines