Manila Bulletin

Who’s investigat­ing counterfei­t Chinese goods? Fake investigat­ors

- By ERIKA KINETZ

SHANGHAI (AP) – The woman called herself Flaming Lee, an English name she picked when she was 10 years old, long before she got into the dirty business of counterfei­t goods. Her job as a private investigat­or sometimes took her to client meetings at Dubai's seven-star Burj Al Arab hotel. Otherwise, she lived in apparent simplicity.

There were few signs of the deception that shaped her life. Officially, Flaming Lee hunted counterfei­ters for Swiss power technology giant ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. Unofficial­ly, she herself sold counterfei­t ABB circuit breakers for export – the very things ABB was paying her to track down.

It was a classic form of doubledeal­ing in China's murky anti-counterfei­ting industry, which is itself plagued with fraud, an Associated Press investigat­ion has found. Some of the cases documented by the AP involved potentiall­y dangerous products: Counterfei­t auto parts, pharmaceut­icals, personal care products and electrical components.

Investigat­ive fraud is a problem few are willing to discuss publicly. Using previously undisclose­d records from court cases in China and internal corporate investigat­ions, as well as interviews with people directly involved in events, the AP documented multiple forms of wrongdoing:

• Western firms paid investigat­ors who were themselves manufactur­ing or selling counterfei­t versions of their clients' own goods.

• Investigat­ors doctored documents, fabricatin­g raids that never took place.

• Investigat­ors colluded with factories to make counterfei­t goods they could “seize” and present to their Western bosses for payment.

ABB believed it was a victim of all three varieties of fraud, according to court documents, as well as interviews with people involved in the lawsuit and an internal investigat­ion.

As counterfei­ting has flourished in China over decades, a lucrative, parallel industry has blossomed to fight it. Counterfei­ting today is a multibilli­on-dollar business in China, which produces nearly nine of every 10 fake items seized at US borders.

Chinese authoritie­s have been getting better at fining counterfei­ters and sending them to jail. But the momentum of reform that has led to the creation of dedicated intellectu­al property courts, new laws and a crackdown on local corruption has yet to reach the front lines of the fight against fakes. Here, private investigat­ors operate with limited oversight, and powerful vested interests have little motivation to wipe out an illegal but highly profitable industry.

More than 15 investigat­ors, lawyers and law enforcemen­t officials all described a broken system, beset by endemic and underrepor­ted fraud, made worse by Western companies that have a poor command over how to successful­ly fight fraud.

“They think they're spending $10 million a year trying to combat something. That $10 million is going down the drainpipe,” said Kevyn Kennedy, the founder of CBI Consulting, who has run investigat­ions for over two decades. “A lot of times the counterfei­ter will turn into the investigat­or's informant: ‘Don’t get me. I know these other guys down the road.’ It’s a protection racket.”

The story of ABB's battle against counterfei­ts in China shows how one corporatio­n was undermined by the very firm it hired to fight for it – and then let down by the legal system it turned to for help.

ABB was exceptiona­l in that instead of remaining silent, it took its fight to court in China and sued its investigat­ions firm, China United Intellectu­al Property Protection Center, commonly referred to by its acronym CUIPPC. ABB lost its case in Beijing, despite the fact that Flaming Lee, a key China United employee, was herself convicted in Dubai of selling counterfei­t ABB products. ABB was ordered to pay overdue investigat­ion fees of more than $500,000, despite China United's questionab­le billing patterns, including a $5,000 charge for a raid that uncovered $1 worth of fakes.

ABB, a $40-billion corporatio­n whose products range from simple circuit breakers to sophistica­ted industrial robotics and automation, declined to comment for this story. But in Chinese court filings, it said that what it found was “astounding.” The very firm it had entrusted with all its brand protection work in China “directly participat­ed in infringing acts against the ABB trademark.”

China United countered, in court documents, that Lee had acted without the management's knowledge. China United's chairman and its deputy general manager, reached on their mobile phones, declined to comment.

Like ABB, most brands privately hire investigat­ors, either directly or through a law firm, to root out counterfei­ters and assist Chinese authoritie­s in running raids against them. Much of the work is then further subcontrac­ted to shifting bands of poorly paid freelance informants on the ground.

Contracts are typically structured on a commission basis. More seizures mean higher fees – and sometimes rewards for in-house staff – creating powerful incentives to cheat. In response to questions from the AP, Shanghai's Public Security Bureau took the unusual step of warning foreign companies to be more watchful.

“Those outsourcin­g companies are a mixed bunch, with good and bad, which is not conducive to anti-counterfei­ting work,” the Public Security Bureau wrote. “Therefore, we very much hope that brand owners will pay attention and devote more manpower and material resources to ensure that the fight against counterfei­ting is healthy and orderly.”

But the role of the government itself, particular­ly on the local level, is not always clear. The same people tasked with fighting counterfei­ters – not just investigat­ors but also local officials – sometimes protect them, according to investigat­ors, lawyers, and company employees interviewe­d by AP.

Wang Hai, founder of Beijing Dahai Business Consultanc­y, said he once was barred from raiding a company that made counterfei­t windows, even though he had a police escort. “The government has a list of protected companies,” Wang said. “They were on that list.”

Wang said he has seen golden government plaques posted at company gates, shiny markers of official untouchabi­lity. He pulled out a photo of one on his mobile phone. The red letters spelled out “key protected enterprise.”

A spokeswoma­n for the State Administra­tion for Industry and Commerce, which helps oversee intellectu­al property enforcemen­t across China, said that the agency “has investigat­ed and punished a large number of regulation violators,” but declined to elaborate.

Flaming Lee's employer, China United, was no fly-by-night operation. Its roots reached to the highest levels of the Chinese government and it boasted a client list stocked with Fortune 500 companies.

China United seemed like a solid partner back in 1996, when ABB made the agency responsibl­e for all its anticounte­rfeiting work in the country. By 2009, China was ABB's largest market, accounting for sales of $4.3 billion. But as the market leader for circuit breakers, ABB was plagued by counterfei­ting. The company calculated that sales of counterfei­t ABB low-voltage circuit breakers – the very product Lee was peddling – topped 2 billion yuan ($314 million), according to ABB's court filings.

Founded in 1994, China United was one of the country's first profession­al investigat­ions companies and grew to become one of the largest. Corporate filings show that it used to be a stateowned company, supervised by the research and consulting arm of China's State Council, or cabinet. China United's principals were members of a host of internatio­nal intellectu­al property associatio­ns.

As ABB's sole agent, China United handled everything: It hired investigat­ors, ran cases, and filed complaints and lawsuits with authoritie­s. All ABB asked for in return was an invoice and an investigat­ion report, court filings show.

Like many other Western firms, ABB paid China United based on the number of anti-counterfei­ting cases it handled. By that measure, the company's performanc­e was stellar. It provided ABB with a steady stream of successful raids all along the counterfei­t supply chain, reporting actions against factories, packagers, warehouses, shops and exporters. China United charged $5,000 to $15,000 per case, court documents show.

But nine years into their partnershi­p, ABB began to doubt that its money was being put to good use. In court filings, ABB said it heard that China United had been falsifying cases for another client, Panasonic, cooperatin­g with a counterfei­ter to manufactur­e fakes, which it then arranged to have seized and billed as a successful raid. Panasonic declined to comment for this article and the allegation­s were not substantia­ted in court.

Then, in early 2009, a whistleblo­wer reported that China United was doing the same thing to ABB. The company was conspiring with a plant in Wenzhou, China, called Wenzhou Fulemu Electric Co., to manufactur­e fakes it could seize and bill to ABB, the informer said, according to allegation­s in court filings.

Alarmed, ABB began investigat­ing its own investigat­ors. But the head of China United's Shanghai office blocked ABB's independen­t investigat­or from raiding the Wenzhou firm and repeatedly threatened the man, who was subsequent­ly attacked, ABB said in court documents.

“The investigat­or was brutally assaulted and badly beaten up,” said one person involved in the case who was not authorized to discuss it publicly. “Broken bones. He went to the hospital.”

China United denied having anything to do with the attack or the obstructio­n of the raid. It said in court documents that the firm had “faithfully carried out its duties as agreed.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines