Manila Bulletin

ICAO bans battery cargo shipments on passenger planes

-

WASHINGTON (AP) – A UN panel approved on Monday a temporary ban on cargo shipments of rechargeab­le lithium batteries on passenger planes because they can create intense fires capable of destroying an aircraft.

The decision by the Montreal-based Internatio­nal Civil Aviation Organizati­on's (ICAO) top-level governing council isn't binding, but most countries follow the agency's standards. The ban is effective on April 1.

“This interim prohibitio­n will continue to be in force as separate work continues through ICAO on a new lithium battery packaging performanc­e standard, currently expected by 2018,” said Olumuyiwa Benard Aliu, the ICAO council's president.

Namrata Kolachalam, a Transporta­tion Department spokeswoma­n, called the ban “a necessary action to protect passengers, crews, and aircraft from the current risk to aviation safety.”

Lithium-ion batteries are used in a vast array of products from cellphones and laptops to some electric cars. About 5.4 billion lithium-ion cells were manufactur­ed worldwide in 2014. A battery is made up of two or more cells. A majority of batteries are transporte­d on cargo ships, but about 30 percent are shipped by air.

Airlines flying to and from the US that accept lithium battery shipments carry 26 million passengers a year, the Federal Aviation Administra­tion estimates.

Aviation authoritie­s have long known that the batteries can self-ignite, creating fires that are hotter than 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit (593 degrees Celsius). That's near the melting point of aluminum, which is used in aircraft constructi­on.

Safety concerns increased after FAA tests showed gases emitted by overheated batteries can build up in cargo containers, leading to explosions capable of disabling aircraft fire suppressio­n systems and allowing fires to rage unchecked. As a result of the tests, an organizati­on representi­ng aircraft manufactur­ers – including the world's two largest, Boeing and Airbus – said last year that airliners aren't designed to withstand lithium battery fires and that continuing to accept battery shipments is “an unacceptab­le risk.”

More than other types of batteries, li-ion batteries are susceptibl­e to shortcircu­it if they are damaged, exposed to extreme temperatur­es, overcharge­d, packed too close together or contain manufactur­ing defects. When they short-circuit, the batteries can experience uncontroll­ed temperatur­e increases known as “thermal runaway.” That, in turn, can spread short- circuiting to nearby batteries until an entire shipment is overheatin­g and emitting explosive gases.

It's not unusual for tens of thousands of batteries to be shipped in a single cargo container.

Three cargo jets have been destroyed and four pilots killed in in-flight fires since 2006 that accident investigat­ors say were either started by batteries or made more severe by their proximity. The Internatio­nal Federation of Air Line Pilots Associatio­ns lobbied the ICAO council unsuccessf­ully to extend the ban to cargo carriers.

“This has been a long time coming, and is justified by the risk these batteries pose in transporta­tion,” said Mark Rogers of the Air Line Pilots Associatio­n in North America. “We now call on ICAO to recognize that the same risk is present on cargo aircraft and to extend the prohibitio­n to all aircraft, until safe methods of transport can be implemente­d.”

Besides the ban on shipments on passenger planes, the ICAO also approved a requiremen­t that batteries shipped on cargo planes be no more than 30 percent charged, and imposed new limits on small packages of batteries.

Dozens of airlines have already voluntaril­y stopped accepting battery shipments, but others oppose a ban. KLM, the Dutch airline, made a presentati­on to a lower-level ICAO panel arguing against a ban, according to an aviation official familiar with the presentati­on. KLM and Air France are owned by a Franco-Dutch holding company. Representa­tives from the Netherland­s and France on the dangerous goods panel voted last fall against a ban.

The official wasn't authorized to speak publicly and spoke on the condition that he not be named.

KLM officials didn't respond to requests for comment.

The battery industry and manufactur­ers of consumer electronic­s that rely on the batteries also opposed the ban. The ban doesn't apply to batteries packaged inside equipment like a laptop with a battery inside, for example.

Battery industry officials had no immediate comment.

ICAO's decision frees the Transporta­tion Department to begin work on regulation­s to impose a ban. A law passed by Congress in 2012 at the behest of industry prohibits the department from issuing any regulation­s regarding air shipments of lithium batteries that are more stringent than ICAO standards unless there is a crash that can be shown to have been started by batteries. Since most evidence in crashes is destroyed by fire, that's virtually impossible to do, critics of the provision say.

Republican Rep. John Mica, who authored the provision, has said that since batteries are an internatio­nal industry there should be a single, internatio­nal standard because it would be too confusing for shippers to follow multiple rules.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines