Manila Bulletin

IMO sets rules to cut sulphur emissions by ships from 2020

- By JONATHAN SAUL

LONDON (Reuters) – The United Nations’ shipping agency set global regulation­s on Thursday to limit the amount of sulphur emissions from vessels and said they would come into force from 2020.

A session of the Internatio­nal Maritime Organizati­on’s (IMO) Marine Environmen­t Protection Committee in London set the new requiremen­ts, which will see sulphur emissions fall from the current maximum of 3.5 percent of fuel content to 0.5 percent.

The move will add extra costs to the shipping industry at a time when parts of it are going through their worst ever downturn. Analysts estimate the additional costs for the container shipping sector alone could be $35-$40 billion.

And some also questioned whether refiners would undertake lengthy and costly investment­s to produce lower sulphur fuel, and so whether there would be enough produced to meet demand.

Environmen­tal groups welcomed the outcome, as well as the 2020 start date. The IMO had considered the option of delaying introducti­on of the regulation­s until 2025.

“This is a landmark decision and we are very pleased that the world has bitten the bullet and is now tackling poisonous sulphuric fuel in 2020,” said Bill Hemmings of campaigner Transport & Environmen­t.

“This decision reduces the contributi­on of shipping to the world’s air pollution impact from about 5 percent down to 1.5 percent and will save millions of lives in the coming decades.”

The shipping industry is among the world’s biggest sulphur emitters, with sulphur oxide content in heavy fuel oil up to 3,500 times higher than the latest European diesel standards for vehicles.

About 90 percent of world trade is transporte­d by sea.

“There will be much to do between now and 2020 to ensure that sufficient quantities of compliant marine fuel of the right quality will indeed be available, and that this radical switch over to cleaner fuels will be implemente­d smoothly ... without distorting shipping markets or having negative impacts on the movement of world trade,” said Simon Bennett, director of policy and external relations with the Internatio­nal Chamber of Shipping associatio­n, which also welcomed what it said was the clear decision by IMO member states on the 2020 date.

Switzerlan­d-based MSC, the world’s No.2 container line, estimated its own additional annual fuel costs at $2.02 billion. The group said it had invested in energy and environmen­tal protection in recent years.

“We fully support the industry’s initiative­s to reduce emissions,” MSC chief executive Diego Aponte said.

“We are, however, mindful of the challenges involved in achieving full compliance, particular­ly when the industry is facing some exceptiona­lly difficult times.”

Refiners will also be affected. Around 3 million barrels per day of high-sulphur fuel oil go into bunker fuel for ships, and most of that will be replaced with lowersulph­ur distillate­s.

“The big thing that is unknown is the implementa­tion roadmap. That will determine how disruptive this is going to be,” said Alan Gelder, head of refining research with energy consultanc­y Wood Mackenzie.

“The refineries will need to run in a way they have never run before.”

Refineries that do not have the ability to convert the fuel oil into higher quality products will struggle to remain profitable as this big outlet for lowerquali­ty fuel disappears.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines