Manila Bulletin

Cusi seeks audit of energy subsidy fund

- By MYRNA M. VELASCO

Energy Secretary Alfonso G. Cusi is proposing an audit of the R74.883 billion worth of collection­s on universal charge for missionary electrific­ation (UCME), as he noted that this energy subsidy fund is not just benefittin­g marginaliz­ed consumers but even the owners of resorts and big commercial establishm­ents in island-provinces.

“I proposed for an audit, but there are some sectors already objecting to it,” he stressed. Neverthele­ss, the energy chief emphasized that he is keen on pursuing that because it distorts the government’s policy direction of just supposedly subsidizin­g end-users that do not have as much financial resources to make ends meet.

The subsidy portion being charged against the UCME is collected from all Filipino consumers in their monthly electricit­y bills. It accounts for the cost difference of the regulated rate approved for island-grid areas versus the true cost of power.

Many areas under the Small Power Utilities Group (SPUG) operations of the National Power Corporatio­n (NPC) are just passing on rates ranging from R8.00 to R12.00 per kilowatt hour, although the actual rate is R14 to R20 per kWh. The tariff difference then is charged against the UCME.

Given that, the subsidy cost being passed on then to all electricit­y consumers via the UCME line item in the bills could be in the range of R4.00 to R8.00 per kWh; depending on the approved tariffs of these island-grids. The total cost is divided among all Filipino ratepayers, hence, the cost pass-on appears marginal if seen in the bills.

But Cusi observed that it’s not just the penny-pinching household consumers that have been benefittin­g from the subsidies – but even deep-pocketed resort and hotel operators as well as mall owners that are operating in these islandanch­ored power service domains.

“In the island-provinces, you have the UCME – the subsidy that people are paying. But even the resorts and malls are entitled to the same subsidy,” Cusi emphasized.

To the energy chief’s assessment, these businesses have the wherewitha­l to pay the actual cost because they are passing on the electricit­y consumptio­n charges anyway as component of their operating and service costs, thus, he is batting for a review of the UCME subsidy scheme.

The collection of UCME, being a separate line item in the electric bills, is done by the distributi­on utilities and other energy suppliers and subsequent­ly remitted to the Power Sector Assets and Liabilitie­s Management Corporatio­n (PSALM) being the fund administra­tor.

Aside from channeling it as direct subsidy to electricit­y tariffs, state-run NPC also taps into the fund on its energizati­on drive of the SPUG areas.

Based on PSALM data, UCME collection­s already reached R74.883 billion as of January this year, with additional interest charges accruing at R44 million. Out of the total collection­s, PSALM further reported that it already disbursed about R74.895 billion, therefore, the remaining amount in the fund now just hovers at R32 million.

For the month of January alone, PSALM noted that it disbursed R1.040 billion to NPC-SPUG “to fund the missionary electrific­ation functions, chargeable against the UCME fund.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines