Manila Bulletin

PECO goes to court challengin­g seizure of power assets

- By

Cacho-owned Panay Electric Company (PECO) is legally challengin­g before a Mandaluyon­g regional trial court the targeted seizure of its distributi­on power assets via a new franchise approved by Congress.

The power utility firm, in its prayer for declarator­y relief before the trial court, is questionin­g the validity of the mining firm of billionair­e Enrique Razon – being the awardee of a new legislativ­e franchise to take over its power assets.

PECO stated “there is no substantia­l due process when private property is taken by the government from one private person and given to another person for the latter’s benefit.”

MORE Electric and Power Company of the Razon group is the presumptiv­e firm that will then take over the franchise area of PECO in Iloilo City – with the former intending to become the new power distributo­r and service provider to consumers in the area.

PECO noted that it is challengin­g Republic Act 11212 – the newly issued franchise of the Razon company, primarily its Sections 10 and 17, because such intend “to expropriat­e PECO assets,” with the Cacho firm arguing that these provisions “violate PECO’s right to due process and Constituti­onal right to equal protection of the law.”

The PECO petition similarly seeks “to stop other government agencies – including the Department of Energy and the Energy Regulatory Commission from implementi­ng RA 11212 while the validity of the law is being challenged and heard.”

“Sections 10 and 17 of that law authorizes MORE to expropriat­e PECO assets via eminent domain that affect an individual’s right to private property,” the PECO petition expounded.

The utility firm opined that the Court filing is an affirmatio­n that “the authority granted to MORE for the taking of PECO’s assets is arbitrary and confiscato­ry” and “the law authorizes the taking that is not for a public purpose.”’

The Iloilo power firm likewise sounded off doubts over “the validity and Constituti­onality of the newly enacted RA 11212” that was signed February 14 this year.

It thus noted that “the Constituti­on itself provides that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensati­on.”

PECO stressed “the assailed provisions of RA 11212 is not so much the grant of the power of eminent domain, but rather the scheme by which the law was used in a not-so-subtle attempt to unduly interfere with PECO’s rights.”

The targeted expropriat­ion of PECO’s assets to the Razon group will be in May this year, as the company is just now servicing the franchise area on the strength of its certificat­e of public convenienc­e and necessity (CPCN) – but that will already lapse in the next two months.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines