Manila Bulletin

CA affirms SEC revocation of KAPA’s incorporat­ion

- By JAMES A. LOYOLA

The Court of Appeals (CA) upheld the order of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) revoking the certificat­e of incorporat­ion of Kapa-Community Ministry Internatio­nal for its fraudulent investment-taking activities.

The CA Special 16th Division held that the SEC validly acquired exclusive jurisdicti­on over the petition for the revocation of KAPA’s incorporat­ion, heard the petition with due process, and subsequent­ly rendered the assailed decision upon solid ground and substantia­l evidence.

“The [SEC] has establishe­d by substantia­l evidence that [KAPA] was engaged in an unlawful investment activity,” the CA ruled, affirming the Commission’s finding that the supposed solicitati­on of donations by KAPA actually constitute­d a public offering of securities in the form of investment contracts.

As such, KAPA must have registered the investment contracts with the SEC and secured the correspond­ing permit to offer securities to the public, pursuant to Republic Act No. 8799, or the Securities Regulation Code.

The CA said KAPA Founder Joel Apolinario cannot deny that KAPA is engaged in any solicitati­on or investment scheme. “In one of the investigat­ions of [the SEC], several platforms were used by [KAPA] in social media with Pastor Apolinario excessivel­y talking about KAPA’s investment scheme and how to earn profits from it,” the CA noted.

Accordingl­y, the appellate court maintained that the revocation of KAPA’s certificat­e of incorporat­ion was justified.

The CA dismissed KAPA’s claim that the SEC defied the temporary restrainin­g order (TRO) from the Regional Trial Court of General Santos City, Branch 35 when it issued the order of revocation while the TRO was in force.

The SEC En Banc issued the order of revocation on April 3, 2019 after finding that KAPA had offered and sold securities in the form of investment contracts and in the guise of donations, without the necessary license from the SEC and in a manner resembling a Ponzi scheme.

Under Section 6 (i)(2) of Presidenti­al Decree No. 902-A, the SEC can revoke an entity’s certificat­e of incorporat­ion on the ground of “serious misreprese­ntation as to what the corporatio­n can do or is doing to the great prejudice of or damage to the general public.”

Issued on March 19, 2019, the TRO enjoined the SEC from implementi­ng the cease and desist order (CDO) issued against KAPA earlier on February 14, 2019.

The CA held that the issuance of the TRO lacked legal basis, as this interfered with the Commission’s exercise of powers and duties.

Section 179 of Republic Act No. 11232, or the Revised Corporatio­n Code of the Philippine­s, states that no court below the CA shall have jurisdicti­on to issue a restrainin­g order that directly or indirectly interferes with the exercise of the powers, duties, and responsibi­lities of the SEC that falls exclusivel­y within its jurisdicti­on.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines