Twitter’s future uncertain as it faces messy breakup with Musk
SAN FRANCISCO (AFP) - Courted and then jilted by the world's richest person, Twitter looks well positioned to win a court battle with Elon Musk over a $1 billion breakup fee and more — but the company will not emerge unscathed.
The entire saga has left observers baffled by what Wedbush analyst Dan Ives described as “one of the craziest business stories ever.”
“I think it starts off as a circus show and it's ending as a circus show,” Ives told AFP.
Musk, the founder of electric car company Tesla, sent a letter to Twitter on Friday saying he was pulling out of the controversial deal he made in April to buy the platform for $54.20 per share, or $44 billion in total.
But such merger agreements are “designed to prevent buyers from getting cold feet and deciding they want to walk away,” explains Ann Lipton, a professor of law at Tulane University who specializes in corporate litigation.
Elon Musk’s move to abandon his purchase of Twitter has been greeted with a mix of relief and disappointment across the political spectrum, with many criticizing the Tesla founder but others applauding his “exposure” of the inĹuential messaging platform.
The announcement of the deal valued at $44 billion in late April sparked fears the platform would see a surge in abuse and disinformation after Musk — a self-proclaimed free speech absolutist — said he would largely let anyone say anything allowed by law on Twitter.
Musk's announcement Friday that he no longer wants to buy Twitter triggered celebration by advocacy groups that had launched a campaign to stop the wealthiest man in the world from going through with the purchase.
“A Twitter under Musk's leadership would have ripped open Pandora's box and reopened the Ĺoodgates for hate and baseless conspiracy theories -- making the platform, and the country a more dangerous place,” said Bridget Todd, communications director at UltraViolet, an advocacy group.
The deal breakdown “is a welcome reprieve for women, people of color and members of the LGBTQ+ community.”
Nicole Gill, co-founder and executive director of the left-leaning watchdog Accountable Tech, slammed Musk's bid as “a chaotic crusade.”
“Our information ecosystem, safety, and democracy cannot remain at the whim of unaccountable billionaires,” she said.
But hopes were dashed for others who believed Musk’s steering of the platform would lead to a decrease in measures aimed at curbing bullying, lies and other abuses deemed politically motivated and anti-free speech. “The party is really over here. The purge is coming,” tweeted conservative commentator Dave Rubin.
Donald Trump Jr, the son of the former president, predicted “censorship” at Twitter “will be back tenfold.” Musk, who also heads SpaceX, has accused the social media giant of “false and misleading representations” about the number of fake accounts on its platform.
His lawyers also point to recent Twitter employee layoffs and hiring freezes, which they say are contrary to the company’s obligation to continue operating normally.
Those arguments may be valid, but they do not merit pulling out of the deal, says Lipton, dismissing them as “nitpicky.”
“It's not enough, unless he can show that the representations (about fake accounts) are not just false, but also that they dramatically call the fundamentals of the deal into question,” she explains.
“Looks very much like Musk is legally wrong.”
Twitter would die off
That leaves the possibility that the multi-billionaire is actually trying to renegotiate the price down.
This tactic has been used successfully elsewhere, such as by LVMH: two years ago, the global luxury giant broke off a deal to acquire Tiffany before getting a discount.
But experts don't see how Musk and Twitter could agree on a different price at this point, given that the platform's stock has lost more than a quarter of its value since late April.
“Both have a lot to lose,” Lipton points out.
If Twitter wins in court, the mercurial entrepreneur will, at a minimum, have to pay a few billion dollars in damages.
At worst, he could be forced to honor his commitment and buy Twitter at a price that has become exorbitant, while his fortune has melted down by tens of billions of dollars in recent months.
But though this would be a victory for shareholders, it would still leave Twitter in Musk’s hands — and his libertarian vision of absolute free speech is not aligned with that of many of the employees, users and advertisers on whom the platform's business model depends.
“Twitter is worse off than six months ago, but in the long run, it's better off without him,” says Creative Strategies analyst Carolina Milanesi.
“It feels like a toy that a spoiled kid wants, but doesn't really know what to do with, so he would get bored of it, and not give it the attention it deserves, and forget it in a corner ... Twitter would die off slowly and painfully,” she predicts.