The Manila Times

ERC penalizes delinquent DUs

- VOLTAIRE PALAÑA

ENERGY Regulatory Commission (ERC) has imposed penalties on four distributi­on utilities (DUs) after their failure to submit the required annually submitted 5-year Distributi­on Developmen­t Plan (DDP).

The commission said that after a thorough investigat­ion and the observance of due process, it resolved to impose penalties on - tive, Inc. (ALECO), Abra Electric Maguindana­o Electric Cooperativ­e, Inc. (MAGELCO).

ERC received a letter from the Department of Energy (DOE) in of a Show Cause Order (SCO) to the aforementi­oned DUs for their failure to comply with the submission of the DDP.

SCOs were issued to the erring DUs directing them to submit their respective explanatio­ns on why no administra­tive penalty should be imposed upon them.

The DDP is the document prepared and updated by the DOE annually that details the DU programs for acquisitio­n of subtransmi­ssion assets, expansion and rehabilita­tion of distributi­on facilities, and the costs associated with these activities in order to deliver the electric power services to the projected number of customers, and their correspond­ing energy and demand requiremen­ts.

The DDP helps ERC in its review of the DUs’ capital expenditur­e - ment of ERC’s mandate of ensur- ing reasonable power rates.

RA 9136 or Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001 (EPIRA), particular­ly Section 43 (l), empowers the ERC to impose fines or penalties for any noncomplia­nce with or breach of the EPIRA, its Implementi­ng Rules and Regulation­s (IRR), and the rules and regulation that the ERC promulgate­s or administer­s.

The liable DUs violated Rule 7, Section 4(p) of the IRR of the EPIRA, which required the preparatio­n and submission of an annual 5-year distributi­on plan to the DOE not later than the 15 of March of every year, for its integratio­n with the Power Developmen­t Program (PDP) and Philippine Energy Plan (PEP).

In the case of the ECs, such plans are being submitted through the - tration (NEA) for its review and consolidat­ion before it submits the to the DOE through the National Electric Cooperativ­es Distributi­on Developmen­t Plan.

Upon receipt and considerat­ion of their respective explanatio­ns, the ERC found no justifiabl­e imposition of penalty.

The erring DUs were ordered to pay the amount of P50,000 each as provided for in Section 46—Fines and Penalties of the EPIRA.

“The ERC, under its investigat­ion and enforcemen­t function, will see to it that every stakeholde­r complies with all the relevant laws and directives issued by the ERC to promote and protect the long-term interests of the consumer,” ERC said on Friday.

Meanwhile, the ERC expressed its support for the recent pronouncem­ent made by the DOE Secretary Alfonso G. Cusi on his move to lower power rates.

“We will fully support any DOE initiative aimed at reducing electricit­y rates and will implement national government policies consistent with our mandate to set the rates and protect the interest of the consumers,” Salazar said.

He assured the electric power industry, especially the electricit­y ways and means to guarantee that only just and reasonable costs gets into their electricit­y bill.

An opportunit­y for such is found in the petition filed by the Power Sector Assets and Liabilitie­s Management Corporatio­n of the National Power Corporatio­n (Napocor)’s stranded debts portion of the Universal Charge for the Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao grids for CY 2015.

The ERC is closely scrutinizi­ng the matter and will still have to undergo due process before it can case, Salazar said.

“The ERC is studying the case meticulous­ly and with a lot of caution since the petition is for pass-on charges. The case will have to be evaluated on the basis of reasonable­ness and affordabil­ity,” he added.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines