The Manila Times

Birth control campaign has ‘not taken off’ – DoH

- AFP

AT age 33 and raising six children in a slum named “Paradise Village,” Myrna Albos is Exhibit A for the Philippine­s’ serial family planning failures.

The plumber’s wife already had four children by the time a family planning law was passed in December 2012, but she had two more after opponents blocked it and the government health centre near her shanty ran out of birth control pills.

“I don’t want any more (children). Sending all of them to school is an effort. One more and I may no longer have time for myself,” the former department store clerk told AFP.

Albos and her family live on her husband’s $10-a-day wage in a dirt-floor home in Paradise Village, tucked behind a smelly open sewer in the north of Manila, the nation’s capital where millions live in brutal poverty.

The law was meant to provide free condoms, birth control pills, implants and other family planning methods to couples in poor communitie­s, while protecting mothers from death and other health risks associated with pregnancie­s.

The law was hailed then as a big victory for the rights of the poor, finally overcoming the powerful Catholic Church and their socially conservati­ve allies in Congress.

The Philippine­s, a former Spanish colony, is the Church’s Asian bastion with 80 percent of the nation’s 103 million people Catholic. The power of the Church, has helped to ensure abortion and divorce remain illegal.

The country’s fertility rate slowed to 2.33 births per woman in 2015 from a runaway six in the 1970s, United Nations data shows but it remains an outlier.

The number of Filipinas who die from complicati­ons of giving birth also remains high, according to the UN figures.

However the legislatio­n turned out to be only the start of another long battle.

The law itself did not come into force until April 2014, as it was delayed by legal challenges.

While the Supreme Court ruled the legislatio­n was constituti­onal, it defanged the law by removing penalties for officials and workers who refused to provide contracept­ives.

It has since been weakened further after some conservati­ve legislator­s gutted its funding.

“We have not taken off. We’ve been taxiing for the last five years,” Health Undersecre­tary Gerardo Bayugo told AFP in an interview, when asked to assess the program.

He said the Supreme Court’s removal of the penalty provisions had rendered the law “basically toothless”, while a lack of funds meant the government could not buy enough contracept­ives.

Breakthrou­gh

President Rodrigo Duterte, who took office last year, has followed in his predecesso­r’s footsteps in trying to get contracept­ives to the masses.

His Food and Drug Administra­tion (FDA) this month ruled that dozens of contracept­ives, including implants and pills, were not abortion inducing and thus the government could distribute them for free.

Condoms were not subject to the challenge but only two percent of Filipino men use them, according to the health department. This is partly due to men not wanting to use them, and their expense.

Church-backed groups filed a case with the Supreme Court in 2015 insisting the implants and other contracept­ives were abortifaci­ents, and thus unconstitu­tional.

The Supreme Court then ordered the government not to distribute those contracept­ives until the FDA made its own ruling on the issue.

Bayugo said the government had started to deliver 500,000 implants, the vast majority of its stocks, following this month’s FDA ruling. But he said it was not nearly enough to tackle the problem.

“The resolution will not cure the funding issue... it’s been our problem for the last five years,” he told AFP.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines