The Manila Times

Group pushes suspension of ERC execs

- JOMAR CANLAS

THE Alyansa Para sa Bagong Pilipinas, Inc. (ABP) has urged the Supreme Court (SC) to allow the suspension of the commission­ers of the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC).

The group asked the high court to void the temporary restrainin­g order issued by the Court of Appeals. It added that the decision of the Office of the Ombudsman suspending Commission­ers Alfredo J. Non, Gloria Victoria C. YapTaruc, Josefina Patricia M. Asirit, and Geronimo D. Sta. Ana is immediatel­y executory pending appeal.

The CA’s 9th Division stopped the implementa­tion of the Ombudsman’s order in February this year.

The four commission­ers were suspended for allegedly giving due preference to the Manila Electric Company (Meralco) and its power supply agreements (PSAs)with affiliated power generation companies.

The Ombudsman said the ERC commission­ers were “administra­tively liable for conduct prejudicia­l to the best interest of the service, aggravated by simple misconduct and simple neglect of duty.”

The ABP contested the CA’s decision, saying the four officials, if allowed to return, “could influence the immediate resolution of the midnight contracts, when in fact, they were precisely discipline­d by the Office of the Ombudsman for their illegal acts related to these midnight contracts.”

The ABP has a separate pending petition before the high court against the ERC, Department of Energy, Meralco, and generating companies in connection with the PSA issue.

Under the competitiv­e selective process, distributi­on utilities may execute a power supply agreement with a generation company after complying with the requiremen­ts. The distributi­on utility is required to open the bidding from generation companies to ensure the least cost of electricit­y. The ERC will not allow distributi­on utilities to file applicatio­ns for PSA without complying with the CSP requiremen­ts.

But the ERC extended the deadline to comply with the CSP until April 30, allegedly to accommodat­e Meralco, which submitted the seven PSAs a day before the deadline, including those for its two subsidiari­es of MeralcoPow­ergen Corp. (MGen) – Redondo Peninsula Energy, Inc., and Atimonan One Energy, Inc.

Environmen­tal groups have been warning that the approval of Meralco’s PSAs will harm people’s health and the environmen­t since it will result in the use of at least 3,551 megawatts of coal.

The Ombudsman also said to dispense with the CSP requiremen­t is not in conformity with the Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001 (Epira) which aims to bring down power rates and improve delivery of supply through greater competitio­n and efficiency in the industry.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines