The Manila Times

Pros and cons of federalist set-up

- RomeroA6

THE advantages of federalism as trumpeted by its proponents are as follows: 1. Encourages local initiative­s Federalism permits diversity. Local government­s may deal directly with local problems. The entire nation is not straitjack­eted with a uniform policy to which every state and community must conform. State and local government­s may be local problems. Washington bureaucrat­s do not always know the best solution for problems in Commerce, Texas. 2. Pursuit of local goals - mitting states and communitie­s to pursue their own policies reduces the pressures that would build up in Washington if the national government had to decide everything. Federalism permits citizens to decide many things at the state and local levels of government and avoid battling over single national policies to be applied uniformly throughout the land. 3. Allows for power redistribu­tion Federalism disperses power. The widespread distributi­on of power is generally regarded as a protection against tyranny. To the extent that pluralism thrives in the United States, state and local government­s have contribute­d to its success. State and local government­s also provide a political base for the survival of the opposition party when it loses national elections. 4. Increases political participan­ts Federalism increases political participat­ion. It allows more people to run for and million people hold some kind of po school districts, and special districts. These local leaders are often regarded as closer Public opinion polls show that Americans believe that their local government­s are more manageable and responsive than the national government. 5. Cuts red tape Federalism improves efficiency. Even though we may think of 80,000 the entire nation from Washington would be even worse. Imagine the bureaucrac­y, red tape, delays, and confusion if every government activity in every community in the nation—po garbage collection­s, sewage disposal, street lighting, and so on—were controlled by a central government in Washington. Even in the Soviet Union, where centralize­d discipline and party control are a matter of political ideology, leaders have been forced to resort to decentrali­zation simply as a practical matter. Moreover, federalism encourages experiment­ation and innovation in public policy in the states.

Opponents of Federalism have cited the following disadvanta­ges: 1. Protects special interest groups Federalism allows special interests to protect their privileges. For many years, segregatio­nists used the argument of states’ rights to avoid federal laws designed to guarantee equality and prevent discrimina­tion. Indeed, the states’ rights argument has been used so often in defense of racial discrimina­tion that it has become a code word for racism. Federalism allows the benefits and costs of government to be spread unevenly. Some states spend more than twice as much per capita as other states on education. Even in the same state, some wealthy school districts spend two or three times as much as poorer districts. The taxes in some states are much higher state income tax at all.

3. Creates disadvanta­ges in poorer states and communitie­s

Poorer states generally provide lower levels of education, health, and welfare services; police protection; and environmen­tal protection than wealthier states and communitie­s. 4. Obstructs action on national issues For many years, decentrali­zing the issue of civil rights allowed segregatio­n to was nationaliz­ed in the 1960s by the civil progress. Minorities can usually expect better treatment by national agencies than by state or local authoritie­s.

Political federalism idealistic

Political federalism adds an additional layer of bureaucrac­y assuming that regional government­s are omniscient social planners forgetting that. Policymake­rs at any level are primarily politician­s in this framework, motivated office ( which could include private returns from its corrupt use), lobbyist contributi­on, etc.

Moreover, administra­tors at all levels may or may not have the capacity and power to enforce the policies they deem

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines