The total defilement of our politics

However, the charge that the budget is laden with billions of pesos in questionable lawmakers’ “pork” remains unresolved. This had provoked an acrimonious back and forth between Budget Secretary Benjamin Diokno and former House majority leader, now Appropriations Committee Chairman Rolando Andaya Jr., and they are not about ready to smoke peace. Andaya has threatened to hound Diokno with plunder charges.

DU30 has vowed to subject the budget to a line- by- line veto on the assailed insertions. And Cabinet Secretary Karlo Nograles for one, who used to chair the House appropriations committee before he joined the Cabinet, has promised to make sure this happens. But highly informed Congress sources doubt that the Cabinet secretaries will allow their respective departments’ appropriations to be easily written off without a fight. The lawmakers themselves will fight tooth and nail to retain the fruits of their legislative privilege. Under the approved budget, members of the House are expected to receive an allocation of P160 million per member, while the senators will receive an average of at least P3 billion each.

The pork reborn

However, sources at the bicameral conference committee, which put the final touches on the P3.757 trillion budget, are convinced some “senators who are smarter than others” will receive infinitely much more. One senator is said to have proposed a total of P88.82 billion in “institutional” and other insertions, while washing his hands clean of any pork barrel or “insertions.” These include P2 billion for the Disaster Risk Reduction Management Fund; P2 billion for the Secretary of Education’s Quick Response Fund; P3.7 billion for a school- based feeding program; P1.7 billion for the Teachers’ Quality and Development Program; P2.92 billion for the computerization program; P920.6 million for the Supreme Court and lower courts; and P970 million for the construction of public markets in the local government units.

The same proponent, according to the same sources, has proposed P2.64 billion for the Philippine National Police, to be taken from the P9.1 billion proposed Local Government Support Fund. Likewise, he has proposed P4.78 billion for the creation of one infantry battalion of the Philippine Army to address the continuing threat of the Abu Sayyaf in Basilan, Sulu and Tawi Tawi; and P1.7 billion for the AFP General Headquarters and AFP- wide service supported units, the funds to be taken from the P8.9 billion proposed DPWH funds for the acquisition of right of way.

Another proposal from the same senator, the sources said, is to allocate P870 million for the acquisition of three light helicopters worth P120 million and three multi- purpose fixed- wing aircraft worth P750 million, for the Philippine Coast Guard.

The same proponent, according to the same sources, has proposed allocating P50.95 billion for the government takeover of the Korean Hanjin Heavy Industries Construction Shipyard, which has run into bankruptcy and whose possible takeover by the Chinese government poses questions of national security to us. It may not be necessarily bad for the government to take over Hanjin, but this should be the subject of a thorough study and decision before anyone moves to throw money into it. So far, there has been no such study, and the government has not decided if it is interested.

Another senator, who heads an important committee, and is running for a local government position in this election, has insertions totaling P25 billion, according to the same sources. How come the public and the other members of the Congress do not know anything about these things? Because of our peculiar budgetary process.

As the proposed budget from the Executive Department is debated, members of the two Houses try to propose whatever amendments they would like to be included in it. But after both Houses have approved their respective versions of the budget, a bicameral conference committee is organized to reconcile the disagreeing provisions of the two Houses. The chairmen of the House appropriations committee and the Senate finance committee normally perform this job with plenary powers from their respective Houses. Normally, only the heads of agencies and the budget secretary are consulted.

Working without pork

At the initiative of a young idealistic group, abuses committed by the Aquino administration in the handling of the “pork barrel” led the Supreme Court to strike down the pork barrel system as “unconstitutional” and to criminalize its abuse. The SC ruling gave rise to high expectations that the guilty would be punished, and that legislators would henceforth learn to do their jobs without expecting to be rewarded with “pork.”

But in the end, not even the former Budget secretary Butch Abad who conceptualized the “Disbursement Acceleration Program” that allowed then President B. S. Aquino 3rd to bribe 19 senator- judges with P50 million or more each in order to convict and remove the late former Chief Justice Renato Corona, was touched; and although candidate DU30 promised to fight corruption everywhere, the “pork barrel” system simply reappeared with a vengeance. Where before every congressman had a questionable pork allocation of P70 million per annum, this quickly rose to at least P120 million — and now to P160 million.

The SC ruling against the pork barrel simply became a joke. In some circles of Congress, they are no longer talking of the “pork barrel.” They are now talking of “parking the entire budget” in order to get the most from all available appropriations. In the Department of Public Works and Highways, sources said the Secretary has given every District Engineer the authority to implement projects worth P100 million on their own. This has not happened in the entire history of the DPWH before, these sources said. This allows the District Engineers to play directly with the congressmen and senators on their own, the sources said.

Parking the budget

But it also allows the DPWH secretary a bigger playing room, these sources said. After putting certain projects under the DE’s authority, the secretary could “park” them back in his office if and when implementation is delayed. This enlarges his power over the projects.

It’s often said that when the greatest American bank robber in history was asked why he kept on robbing banks, he answered, “because that’s where the money is.” This is what has become of many, if not most, of our current politicians — bank robbers. Why are they in politics? Because, that’s where the money is. They are in Congress not to make good laws, which they know nothing about, but simply to make a pile, even at the expense of everything else. Most of those who sold their souls to Aquino in order to get rid of an independent- minded magistrate are still sitting in the Senate, and new ones are coming who will probably not mind doing much worse. Yesterday, when the official campaign period for the May 13 elections began, we heard the most absurd pompous injunction from the Commission on Elections.

Candidates were told to obey all election laws to help ensure the holding of a clean and honest election in May. This was the most hypocritical and revolting announcement one heard from the poll body. For the past several months, the former presidential special assistant and senatorial wannabe Christopher Lawrence “Bong” Go covered the entire country with his mugshot, without being reminded of the election law. Knowing he is a candidate for the Senate, he cannot say he’s not yet campaigning just because none of his posters says, “Vote for Bong Go.” I have a friend who drove all the way to Baguio hoping to give his young children a sunlit view of the mountainside on his way to Baguio. They missed the mountainside. They only saw the posters of Bong Go.

I join the family and friends, and the nation’s art and cultural community, in mourning the loss of Armida Siguion Reyna, who joined her Maker on Monday afternoon at 88. She was a great inspiration and a dear friend. Her enduring TV show “brought joy to so many hearts, but her warm personality and sparkling conversation enlivened the young and old alike. My wife and I will always treasure the fact that she sang so beautifully at our wedding on Aug. 20, 1970, with Fr. Horacio de la Costa, S.J., at the Sanctuario de San Jose, Greenhills. I ask the gentle reader to join me in praying for the repose of her soul. Thank you.

IN MEMORIAM.

Basilan and Isabela City ( Feb. 9, 2018), and in Zamboanga City ( Feb. 9, 2018). We heard those who supported and opposed the then Bangsamoro Basic Law bill, the civil society, non- governmental organizations, interest groups, business groups, politicians, and even individuals. Our out- of- town committee meetings were among the most attended by the members of the Senate and stakeholders. Though pressed for time in our provincial hearings, we made extra effort to hear everybody as much as we could. Also, at the onset of our committee hearings and upon the motion of Senator Drilon, all the records of the previous Congress on the BBL were deemed part of the proceedings of the BBL in the current Congress, thus the consultations and other discussions in the previous Congress were taken into consideration as well. We also conducted technical working group meetings with several senators, technical staff, and stakeholders to finetune the committee report.

In the Senate plenary, we debated on committee report SBN 1717 for almost a month, with several legal minds in the Senate ably assisting me in defending the legality and constitutionality of the bill, among them then Senate President Koko Pimentel, and Senators Sonny Angara, Franklin Drilon and Richard Gordon. We also accepted amendments to the bill to make sure that it would pass the constitutional and legal challenges. The bill passed unanimously on third reading in the Senate ( 21 in favor, no negative vote and no abstention) with strong bipartisan support, rarely seen in an administration measure and important piece of legislation. For once, all senators agreed with the proposal to push for a just and lasting peace in Muslim Mindanao.

During the bicameral conference committee meetings, we braved the floods and defied work suspensions just to finish within our timetable. In total we conducted six days of bicameral conference committee meetings with an average of 13 hours each day, with some days lasting until the wee hours of the morning. Thus, several of the bicam panelists, both in the House of Representatives and in the Senate, said that the BOL bicam was one of the longest and hardest bicams they had ever participated in. During the bicam conference, we would break into several subcommittees to tackle specific articles, such as the Articles on the Territory, Powers of the BARMM, the Parliament, and the Shari’ah Justice System, to name a few. In the bicam subcommittees, the bill went through some major and perfecting amendments, primarily to satisfy the constitutional test. Before we would take a look at the final text of the bicam report and sign it, the technical staff of both chambers would spend several days consolidating and incorporating the amendments introduced in the bicam and do editorial corrections when necessary.

In short, the BOL went through the wringer in the Senate. To claim otherwise is an insult to the Senate as an institution and a disservice to the efforts put forth by the legislators, technical staff, stakeholders and resource persons in the passage of the BOL.

Fast forward, prior to the plebiscite and upon filing of the overnor of Sulu of his petition before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the