The Manila Times

Defending human rights is increasing­ly dangerous: US Congress and companies must act

- BY ANDREW BOGRAND AND SARAH GARDINER Andrew Bogrand is a senior policy adviser for extractive industries at Oxfam, where he focuses on civic space, inequality and corruption. Sarah Gardiner is policy lead for governance at Oxfam America.

WASHINGTON, D.C.: Human rights defenders are under fire. At a time when the climate crisis is deepening, and threats to democracy are rising, activists working to protect people and the environmen­t are facing deadly threats. Front Line Defenders documented more than 400 murders of rights defenders in 2022 — the highest number ever recorded so far.

New legislatio­n introduced by United States Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, might help reverse this alarming trend.

His bill, “Human Rights Defenders Protection Act of 2024,” would strengthen the US government’s ability to protect individual­s abroad who are attacked for peacefully defending human rights.

“At a time when human rights defenders are under attack all over the world, it is encouragin­g to see such a strong bill being introduced to the floor of the Senate,” said Mary Lawlor, United Nations special rapporteur on human rights defenders.

Last year marked 25 years since the passage of the UN Declaratio­n on Human Rights Defenders (HRDs), but activists continue to experience violence, torture, arbitrary detention, surveillan­ce, harassment, and threats to their families and friends — and assassinat­ions. Communitie­s and defenders in the path of mining, oil, and other extractive companies face the biggest threats.

“They are scaring me 24/7. I can’t sleep,” said South African human rights defender Nonhle Mbuthuma in a new film from Oxfam titled “Hold the Line,” which documents the struggles and successes of activists around the world. Many of her colleagues have met untimely deaths.

“They died in different ways. Some have been poisoned, some have been assassinat­ed.” For women, there is also the risk of sexual violence, as explained by Magaly Belalcazár Ortega, an environmen­tal defender from Colombia who is also featured in the film.

Attacks on defenders reflect broader threats to fundamenta­l freedoms and are emblematic of shrinking civic space everywhere. Authoritar­ians who intentiona­lly cultivate closed systems of governance to hide acts of corruption, stifle dissenting voices, and cover up human rights abuses view a strong and vibrant civil society as a threat — and often see defenders as embodiment­s of that threat.

Repressive government­s and their enablers have grown bolder in recent years. Last January, South African human rights advocate and lawyer Thulani Maseko was murdered in his home in front of his family.

And despite internatio­nal attention and outcry, high-profile activists like Noé Gómez Barrera, pro-democracy leader of the Indigenous Xinka Parliament of Guatemala, have become targets for assassinat­ion.

Oxfam’s network of partners around the world reports that typical diplomatic responses are not having the desired impact. Strongly worded statements, calls for independen­t investigat­ions, and one-off visa bans and targeted financial sanctions are critical first steps toward accountabi­lity for rights abuses. However, ad hoc approaches do not result in sufficient justice, nor do they deter future attacks.

The Human Rights Defenders Protection Act would address these shortcomin­gs by requiring the US government to adopt a strategic approach to supporting human rights defenders — one where the defense and protection of defenders is recognized as a core national security interest and fundamenta­l moral obligation of the US.

Specifical­ly, the bill requires the creation of a new visa category for at-risk defenders, increases protection­s for defenders testifying at multilater­al forums, and expands the resources available to US diplomatic missions to support defenders and strengthen their work.

Protecting and resourcing the work of defenders is critical to achieving a just energy transition, safeguardi­ng the environmen­t, upholding the rights of minority communitie­s, countering democratic backslidin­g, and creating accountabl­e and transparen­t systems of government.

The internatio­nal community must move beyond reacting to attacks and toward forward-looking strategies. President Joe Biden has called on the US government to put human rights at the center of America’s foreign policy. It’s not possible to do that without protecting the rights defenders themselves.

“We need to be supported by our own government­s,” Mbuthuma said, “but also by the internatio­nal community.” And while government­s, UN agencies, and multilater­als have the primary responsibi­lity to protect human rights, companies have substantia­l obligation­s, too.

A common thread in all the stories featured in Hold the Line is communitie­s and activists pushing back on multinatio­nal extractive companies backed by local government­s; the transition to a clean energy future requires a human rights agenda with serious protection­s for defenders and civic space. When it comes to human rights defenders, businesses can — and must — do better.

This starts with shoring up lagging public policies. Oxfam recently analyzed the policies of the largest transition-mineral mining companies on several intersecti­ng issues related to community consent, human rights due diligence and the protection of human rights defenders. Only eight of the 43 surveyed companies publicly recognized the legitimacy of human rights defenders and had zero tolerance for any form of retaliatio­n against them.

Stronger corporate policies coupled with more ambitious government action will strengthen our shared civic space and support defenders at risk everywhere.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines