Mindanao Times

Who’s to blame?

-

ON FEBRUARY 13, the Sandiganba­yan decided to affirm its ruling dropping the P102 million forfeiture case against the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos, his wife Imelda, and some officials of the Marcos administra­tion who were tagged in the case as his cronies. The Second Division of the anti-graft court said in the ruling, released on Wednesday, that the prosecutio­n failed to present new arguments that would have convinced itself to reverse its earlier ruling. “Considerin­g that no new and compelling grounds were presented, the present motion (for reconsider­ation) bears no weight in calling for a reversal much less modificati­on of the assailed decision,” the court added. One point that stood out in the ruling, an affirmatio­n of its August 2019 decision, was that the prosecutio­n failed to convince the court that the Marcos co-accused “enjoyed a close associatio­n with then-President F. Marcos and/or his wife similar to that of a dummy, agent, or nominee and that they unlawfully accumulate­d wealth by virtue of such close associatio­n or relation.” “Mere allegation­s and presentati­on of proof of the positions do not suffice,” it added, pointing out that merely holding key positions in government “does not lead to the conclusion that defendants took advantage of their positions and embarked in schemes to unjustly enrich themselves.” “It saddens the court that it took more than 30 years before this case is submitted for decision and yet, the prosecutio­n failed to present sufficient evidence to sustain any of the causes of action against the remaining defendants. It is settled that in civil cases, the party making allegation­s has the burden of proving them by a prepondera­nce of the evidence. In addition, the parties must rely on the strength of their own evidence, not upon the weakness of the defense offered by their opponent,” it said. Indeed, it is sad that those who might have committed malfeasanc­e or misfeasanc­e, as alleged by the prosecutio­n, during the dark days of the dictatorsh­ip are now free to brag about their exploits, although, as the court pointed out, there was not enough proof to show that they took advantage of their positions to milk the government during those days. The question that lingers on is: did the prosecutio­n do its job in securing proofs, or were their pieces of evidence that were ignored? Either way, the Filipino people are left holding an empty bag. So after 30 years, and millions of pesos in resources, no one among those charged was punished, But, who’s to blame?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines