Mindanao Times

Hidden harms in the workplace

- BY HERMAN M. LAGON

IN RECENT years, the concept of maintainin­g a positive outlook in the workplace has been widely embraced. However, an overemphas­is on forced positivity, frequently labeled as ‹toxic positivity,› can lead to adverse impacts on employee well-being and morale. This phenomenon, while cloaked in the guise of motivation and encouragem­ent, often dismisses genuine concerns and emotions, leading to an unhealthy work environmen­t.

Toxic positivity in the workplace manifests in various forms. Imagine a scenario where an employee, overwhelme­d by unrealisti­c deadlines and workload, is simply encouraged to “look on the bright side” or reminded that “others have it worse.” Such responses, though possibly well-intentione­d, invalidate the employee›s stress and discourage open communicat­ion about workplace challenges. This culture of enforced optimism not only neglects the real issues at hand but can also lead to increased stress and job dissatisfa­ction.

The insistence on maintainin­g a positive front can be particular­ly harmful to young profession­als who are navigating the complexiti­es of their careers. They might feel pressured to suppress their true feelings to fit into the organizati­onal culture, leading to internal conflicts and diminished self-worth.

Leaders and supervisor­s wield significan­t influence in either perpetuati­ng or mitigating toxic positivity. When a boss consistent­ly downplays the struggles of their team, insisting on a positive outlook despite clear problems, it not only erodes trust but also stifles the potential for meaningful problem-solving and innovation. For example, when an employee expresses concerns about the direction of a project and receives a dismissive response like «just stay positive, it will all work out,» it conveys a message that their input and concerns are not respected or taken seriously.

Furthermor­e, toxic positivity can have a ripple effect across the organizati­on, creating a facade where problems are glossed over, and genuine emotional expression­s are discourage­d. This superficia­l positivity can lead to a lack of authentic connection­s among colleagues, as everyone is playing a part rather than being true to themselves and their experience­s.

Toxic positivity can be particular­ly insidious among local and small-scale establishm­ents. It can undermine the communal support systems that are a cornerston­e of our society. The approach that emphasizes on reflection and discernmen­t offers a valuable counterbal­ance. It encourages individual­s to acknowledg­e and explore their emotions, both positive and negative, fostering a more authentic and empathetic workplace culture.

Counteract­ing toxic positivity requires a shift towards a more balanced approach to emotions in the workplace. Employers and leaders may consider fostering an environmen­t where employees feel not only safe but also encouraged to express a wide spectrum of emotions. This includes acknowledg­ing struggles and failures as much as celebratin­g successes. Encouragin­g open dialogue, where employees can share their concerns without fear of dismissal or reprimand, is vital. This approach not only validates employees› emotions but also nurses s a culture of trust and respect.

Moreover, replacing generic positive platitudes with empathetic listening and supportive action can significan­tly impact employees› well-being. For example, rather than responding to an employee›s stress with «Just stay positive,» a more helpful approach would be, «I see you›re going through a tough time. How can I support you?» Transition­ing from a dismissive approach to a supportive stance can have a profound impact on the

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines