Panay News

Never DIY a long-standing family conflict

- PN

THIS ARTICLE allows me to reflect on a lot of initiative­s related to my role as advisor to family enterprise­s in Europe. Due to the pandemic that has ravaged many economies all over the world during the last two years, my visit here in Barcelona, a first in two years, is long overdue and I could not wait to final lyreenergi­ze family members in person and tackle important concerns that have been sidelined because of the crisis. Volatile Interactio­n between the family and the business

Family- owned businesses face major challenges in working through ownership and management succession and family members especially i ts leaders acknowledg­e that there are problems that need to be addressed. Usually, at the first sign of family conflict, families would attempt to resolve their difference­s amongst themselves. However, when the conflict escalates and leaders, usually parents, sense that despite their interventi­on, many issues continue to simmer (sibling rivalry, entitlemen­t, intergener­ational conflict, in- law issues, leadership dynamics, ego, pride, etc.), the family scrambles to engage a family business consultant to facilitate family governance and the usual end goal is to diffuse the tension, promote family unity and use the family constituti­on as a platform to manage conflict and regulate behaviors of working and nonworking family members. When the family signs and promises to faithfully implement the rules, in theory, it looks doable but in reality, it can be daunting. So the mindset of continuous improvemen­t must

always be top of mind for all members. Governance is a Process, Not an Event

Families must recognize that the journey does not stop when families sign and enthusiast­ically show their expression­s of support to abide by the rules of the constituti­on. The signing simply signifies that it is just the beginning of another process. What’s worse i s that families stop short of implementi­ng what was agreed upon. It is also rather unfortunat­e that when the consultant is no longer around to help in the process of internaliz­ing the agreement, the problems return with a vengeance.

Why is this happening? That was the question raised to me by a founder many years ago. They engaged a consultant and immediatel­y right after the signing of the constituti­on, they disengaged his services. Six months later, the conflict returned.

Why is it extremely important to energize family members by way of providing post-constituti­on family council oversight? Was subjecting the family to a long and rigorous exercise of drafting family agreements like the Code of Ethical Conduct, the Covenants and in most cases completing the process of getting them to adhere to the terms of the agreement sufficient enough? It is not enough The Dangers of DIY Governance

In my years advising families in Asia, I have noticed a natural tendency for family members to “slack off ” right after t he agreements have been signed. In some cases, families would even lean towards a DIY ( Do It Yourself) type of governance for the flimsiest of reasons...”take a break from months of governance session, they want to prioritize and focus on making money, cost considerat­ion and the ‘feeling’ that the family is talking again.” When this happens, the likelihood of compliance takes a backseat, gets derailed and the “old practice” of mixing family and business issues surfaces. Family members only react when a major conflict or incident happens. By that time, the family is already gripped in a state of emotional tension and another round of escalating conflict is already taking shape. By that time, interventi­on may be too late and litigation lawyers are now being floated by warring members.

After pursuing the DIY route and disaster ensues, business owners, out of desperatio­n, are forced to call in the profession­als to clean up their mess. Unlike a typical DIY TV show, where the show’s producers cover the DIYers’ costs, the costs of fixing a legal DIY disaster rest solely on the business. So when we are called to intervene, we usually decline 90% of the time and part off with a “See I told you so but you never listened” response./

The signing simply signifies that it is just the beginning of another process. What’s worse is that families stop short of implementi­ng what was agreed upon.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines