Philippine Daily Inquirer

Leni pushes pork scam probe ‘to clear’ House

- By Juan Escandor Jr.

NAGA CITY, Camarines Sur—The widow of Jesse Robredo will push for an impartial and thorough investigat­ion of the alleged misuse of P10 billion in pork barrel of five senators and 23 members of the House of Representa­tives to clear Congress of “bad reputation.”

Camarines Sur Rep. Leni G. Robredo lamented that the alleged irregulari­ties exemplifie­d by the exposé of six whistleblo­wers against businesswo­man Janet Lim-Napoles had tainted the House and its members.

In affidavits submitted to the National Bureau of Investigat­ion, the six whistle-blowers, former employees of Napoles, claimed that up to 60 percent of the public funds funneled into fake NGOs and nonexisten­t projects represente­d kickbacks of lawmakers. The rest went to Napoles and her group.

“It’s unfair for us who are against corrupt practices to be dragged into the mess. All of us (representa­tives) must agree [to] an impartial, fair and deep investigat­ion,” Robredo said.

Her position is in sharp contrast to that taken by Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr., who said there was no need for a House probe because the Department of Justice was already investigat­ing the matter.

Besides, Belmonte said, most of the 23 House members linked to the pork barrel scam had left the chamber before he became Speaker in the 15th Congress.

Transparen­t probe

Robredo said there was a need to make a full and transparen­t probe because any public doubt about it would bring more damage to the institutio­n.

“For a very long time, Congress has suffered a reputation problem. I see something is bad in Congress,” she said.

Robredo, who captured the country’s admiration for her calm and composure amid the tragic death of her husband nearly a year ago, went on to win the seat of her province’s third congressio­nal district in the House against a member of a well-entrenched political clan, Nelly Villafuert­e, wife of the district’s former Rep. Luis Villafuert­e.

Jesse Robredo, then secretary of the Department of the Interior and Local Government and noted for his commitment to good governance and transparen­cy in government transactio­ns, was heading home to Naga City from an official visit to Cebu when his plane crashed in waters off Masbate City on Aug. 18, 2012.

“I believe that any irregulari­ty in the PDAF (Priority Developmen­t Assistance Fund) will escape the scrutiny of the representa­tives involved (in the misuse of PDAF),” Robredo said. PDAF is the official name of the pork barrel.

She added that those representa­tives found involved in the scam must be penalized “for the sake of the institutio­n.”

Robredo, a member of the ruling Liberal Party, said that even during the privilege speech delivered by the minority bloc, many of them in the majority agreed to the need for a House probe of the PDAF misuse.

The minority has filed a resolution seeking a House probe, saying that the “magnitude and the destructiv­e effects of the PDAF scam must not be swept into oblivion, as the issue is destroying the trust that members of the Philippine Congress should enjoy from the people they represent.”

Robredo said she was initially for the abolition of the PDAF because it was promoting political patronage. She changed her mind after looking at things not just as a lawmaker but as a representa­tive of her district. She said she had responsibi­lities to help in the developmen­t of her district.

Each House member is entitled to P70 million in PDAF yearly and each senator, P200 mil- lion for their pet projects.

Robredo said the PDAF could be a developmen­t tool if it had clear criteria for projects, like targets and benchmarks.

DBM circular

The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) in National Budget Circular No. 537 issued on Feb. 20, 2012, listed down seven particular­s for the project menu and requiremen­ts: education, health, livelihood, social services, peace and order, arts and culture, and public infrastruc­ture projects.

Members of Congress identify priority programs and projects that are to be funded by their PDAF.

“(P)reference shall be given to projects located in the fourth to sixth-class municipali­ties or indigents identified under the National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction by the Department of Social Welfare and Developmen­t without necessaril­y excluding other municipali­ties and beneficia- ries,” says its guidelines.

The agencies identified to implement PDAF projects include national government agencies, local government units (LGUs) and government-owned and/or -controlled corporatio­ns (GOCCs).

Under Circular No. 537, “funds shall be released directly to the implementi­ng agencies enumerated in the PDAF Project Menu. However, in the case of LGUs, funds shall be released to the Department of Budget and Management as the fund administra­tor and for GOCCs, funds shall be released to the Bureau of Treasury.”

Robredo said she would formulate benchmarks and targets in partnershi­p with agencies and entities involved in the implementa­tion of PDAF projects to avoid patronage politics.

“It’s not that those who are near to me will be given a project. It must be based on the performanc­e and achievemen­t of the benchmark we will formulate,” she said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines