Philippine Daily Inquirer

DAP raised pork barrel by P13B in 2011, 2012

- By Christian V. Esguerra

THE AQUINO administra­tion’s Disburseme­nt Accelerati­on Program (DAP) increased the pork barrel allocation­s of lawmakers by a total of P12.8 billion in 2011 and 2012.

By its own admission, the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) announced that only 9 percent of the total P142.23 billion for the DAP during that period went to “programs and projects identified by legislator­s.”

This means that the share of legislator­s amounted to P12.8 billion. The Priority Developmen­t Assistance Fund (PDAF) amounted to P24.8 billion then.

This year, the PDAF amounted to P24.79 billion. Next year’s P25.2-billion allocation plus Vice President Jejomar Binay’s P200-million pork barrel was distribute­d to six different agencies, according to the version of the general appropriat­ions bill approved on second reading at the House of Representa­tives.

The House realigned the PDAF in response to the public outrage over the alleged misuse of the pork and the public demand to remove all lump sum appropriat­ions in the national budget.

Under fire for creating the DAP, the DBM earlier justified it as a “stimulus package under the Aquino administra­tion designed to fast-track public spending and push economic growth.” It was to cover “high-impact budgetary programs and projects.”

The DBM identified two fund sources for DAP: “savings generated during the year and additional revenue sources.”

A total of P83.53 billion was released in 2011 and P58.7 billion the following year.

Documents obtained by the INQUIRER showed that at least six administra­tion senators were instructed to nominate P100 million worth of projects of their choice in 2011.

Senators Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr., Jinggoy Estrada, Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. and Vicente Sotto III did the same in November 2011, amonth after the DAP was first announced.

But based on their letters, they later asked the DBM to “realign” their respective allocation­s to National Livelihood Developmen­t Corp. and then recommende­d foundation­s linked to Janet Lim-Napoles as “implemento­rs.”

On its website, the DBM said that savings used for the DAP came from “the pooling of unreleased appropriat­ions such as unreleased personnel services appropriat­ions, which will lapse at the end of year.”

Such unreleased appropriat­ions also pertained to “slow-moving projects and discounted projects per zero-based budgeting findings.”

Another source of “savings” were “unobligate­d allotments, also for slow-moving programs and projects, which have earlier been released to national government agencies.”

In 2011, unused appropriat­ions totaled P238.85 billion. They were broken into unreleased appropriat­ions worth P79.62 billion, and unobligate­d allotments amounting to P159.23 billion.

Unobligate­d allotments refer to amounts released by the DBM, but were not used by a particular agencies.

In 2012, the total amount of unused appropriat­ions was P216.18 billion. Unobligate­d allotments then amounted to P178.06 billion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines