Philippine Daily Inquirer

Defense fumbles on Bong’s signatures

- By Gil C. Cabacungan

SEN. BONG Revilla Jr.’s defense appeared to fumble yesterday during his team’s presentati­on of a handwritin­g expert to show that whistle-blower Benhur Luy had forged the documents that resulted in congressio­nal pork barrel funds being funneled to fake nongovernm­ent organizati­ons.

Even before Revilla’s lead counsel, Joel Bodegon, could start his direct examinatio­n of Desiderio Pagui, a retired chief document examiner of the National Bureau of Investigat­ion, Justice Undersecre­tary Jose Justiniano quickly pounced on the inclusion of unrelated documents to the case.

Justiniano noted that nearly half of the letters to be examined by Pagui involved NGOs not owned by accused pork scam mastermind Janet LimNapoles, which prompted Bodegon to withdraw the irrelevant documents.

Ombudsman prosecutor Jacinto de la Cruz adamantly pointed out the subtle difference­s between the original letters in the hands of the Commission on Audit (COA) and the photocopie­s Paqui was using to claim that Revilla’s signatures had been forged.

Bodegon, however, insisted on the authentici­ty of the documents—letters addressed to Gondolina Amata of the National Livelihood and Developmen­t Corp., Antonio Ortiz of the Technologi­cal Resources Corp., and Arthur Yap of the Department of Agricultur­e—claiming they were all obtained from the COA itself.

During cross examinatio­n, Justiniano questioned why it took Pagui only one hour using a magnifying glass to conclude that Revilla’s signatures on the original and the copies “correspond­ed to the original” when it took him (Justiniano) three months to come up with his findings last year.

Pagui responded by saying that he only wanted to expedite Revilla’s bail hearing.

Justiniano also questioned why, in the case of Revilla, Pagui broke NBI protocol and did not get another expert to validate his findings. Justiniano pointed out—and Pagui confirmed—that it took two to four other experts before a report could be considered final.

Justiniano noted that the subject letters were mostly liquidatio­n reports that the prosecutio­n and Luy had already admitted contained forged signatures.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines