‘Pantawid-gutom’
TO TIDE over, through the sea of hunger from one island of satiety to another: Such is the image conveyed by the term “pantawid-gutom.” For people who eat three meals a day, and merienda in between, it may be a term that we rarely encounter in our everyday lives. But it means a lot for people who regularly experience an empty stomach.
What makes a good pantawid-gutom? The foremost and most obvious consideration is the ability to momentarily alleviate hunger. Second, it has to be easy to prepare and consume. Finally, it has to be affordable. After all, lack of funds is what keeps most people from buying better food in the first place.
Street food is perhaps the most common form of pantawid-gutom. Doreen Fernandez surveyed Filipino street food in the early 1990s, dutifully chronicling some of those colorfully named: “Adidas” for chicken feet, “PAL” for wings, “Walkman” for pig’s ears. Over two decades later, these dishes have been joined by pancit canton and other “instant” food such as candies and junk food. High in oil, simple sugars, and artificial flavors, many of these instant products have “empty calories” that do provide some energy but are without nutrients that the body needs. Moreover, they have been implicated in the rise of noncommunicable diseases like hypertension and heart disease as well as communicable ones like hepatitis A and gastroenteritis.
When people see what they eat as pantawidgutom, they themselves recognize that these are not the ideal foods for their bodies but that given the circumstances, these would suffice.
Some also use certain drugs as pantawidgutom. In my own research on the use of shabu (methamphetamine), I found that one of its desirable effects (for its users) is its potent ability to suppress hunger. This, and its other effects, such as giving alertness and allowing people to stay awake, make it a particularly appealing choice for people who have to work all day and night, such as vendors and drivers, among many others. “Rugby,” often used by street children, as well as the nicotine in cigarettes, can have a similar effect. Much of the discourse around drugs has focused on how they are linked to addiction, peer pressure and criminality, but often overlooked are the ways in which they are used by people to deal with their physiologic needs and everyday problems, such as hunger.
Who in our society commonly resort to pantawid-gutom? First, the urban poor, for whom access to food is as good as the money they can earn for the day—a “food insecurity” that we commonly express as “isang kahig, isang tuka” (literally, “one scratch, one bite”). Children are not spared of this predicament, and the impact is particularly alarming: Lack of healthy food leads to stunting and future health problems, as well as weak immune systems that contribute to more infant and child deaths.
Second, people who have to work for long hours without food, such as construction workers, laborers, street vendors, and drivers. Often, these are people who belong to the informal sector, unprotected by labor laws. Their lack of funds and time to prepare food impels them to eat just enough pantawid-gutom until they get home.
Finally, overworked individuals—whether in the corporate world, in call centers, hospitals, schools and various other institutions. They too, sometimes resort to pantawid-gutom to finish their tasks.
Drawing on the meanings of pantawidgutom, the government named its conditional cash transfer scheme “Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program,” or “4Ps.” While there have been indications of positive results, its wider impact remains unclear. According to a recent SWS survey, 4.8 million Filipino families said they experienced hunger in the past month, representing 22 percent of our entire population.
*** The whole notion of pantawid-gutom speaks to us of the hunger that many Filipinos experience on a daily basis, and the tactics (“diskarte“) they deploy in order to get by (“para makaraos“). Sadly, many of us have been desensitized to images of children sniffing rugby, or families on the streets partaking of pancit canton and whatever else they can find. Moreover, access to healthy food among people working in different sectors, formal or informal, have often been overlooked.
The challenge for nutritionists and policymakers is to come up with and promote food alternatives that are safer and healthier, but just as accessible and affordable. Admittedly, this is not an easy task, because for food to be “instant” and “cheap,” a lot of nutritional sacrifices have to be made. But we can start with foods that are already available, like proteinrich taho, boiled bananas, and kamote-cue. In addition, these efforts should go hand in hand with strengthening the agricultural sector to increase yield and lower food prices. Moreover, for people who resort to pantawid-gutom out of convenience, not out of necessity, education on the health risks of an unbalanced diet can go a long way.
As for those for whom there is little choice, we are called upon to show understanding, empathy and solidarity. Many Filipinos rely on pantawid-gutom— unsafe and unhealthy food, and even drugs—to tide them over, even as the economic gulf grows wider, and the islands of satiety seem fewer and farther apart. Rather than be judgmental or indifferent to their predicament, we should examine and act on the circumstances that have led to their chronic hunger in the first place.