Philippine Daily Inquirer

Allegation­s about Poe’s absenteeis­m absolute lie

- —ALFRED A. YUSON, JOEY ROMERO, PATROCININ­A D. BINUNGCAL, MA. CECILIA L. NUBLA, TERESITA B. VILLARAMA, MANUEL R. BUISING, GABRIELA R. CONCEPCION, MILO M. SOGUECO, MARTA INES A. DAYRIT, ERIC F. MALLONGA, JOSE ANTONIO K. VELOSO, ROBERT R. ANDREWS, CATHY S

AS BOARD members of the Movie and Television Review and Classifica­tion Board (MTRCB) in the years Sen. Grace Poe chaired this agency, we take exception to the allegation of INQUIRER columnist Ramon Tulfo about her alleged absenteeis­m at the time, as well as the supposed reason behind it (“Under fire from all sides,” Metro, 3/15/16).

“My sources at the Movie Television Classifica­tion Board (sic) (MTRCB), where she was chair before running for the Senate, claimed the chain-smoking Poe was reportedly always absent because of a hangover from drinking the previous night,” Tulfo said. This is pure canard, an absolute falsehood.

Also, Tulfo raised other matters appearing to be part of a typical demolition job against a presidenti­al candidate, but it was his final statement in the column that we feel we have to respond to and give the lie, in the service of the truth.

As MTRCB chair, Grace Poe Llamanzare­s fulfilled her responsibi­lities most commendabl­y, exceeding all expectatio­ns with her zeal, intelligen­ce, drive, initiative­s and positive decisions, which led the board in exercising its mandate in a decidedly more progressiv­e and proactive manner.

Among the numerous improvemen­ts she initiated were: the addition of the “R-16” rating for movies, and the “SPG” (Strong Parental Guidance) classifica­tion for TV programs; the holding of the “First MTRCB Child Summit”; agreements which limit bus franchises and interislan­d ships to show only “G”- and “PG”-rated films in public conveyance­s; the regular conduct of public hearings and conference­s with stakeholde­rs from all sectors; and the swift adjudicati­on of controvers­ial incidents involving broadcaste­rs, show biz personalit­ies and dominant networks.

We were all energized and inspired by her devotion to work, let alone her ideas. To repeat, Tulfo’s allegation about her absenteeis­m is farthest from the truth, an absolute fabricatio­n.

The little over two years we came to know her remains a splendid memory of how it was to be inspired by a vigorous leader who was a quick study and a sharp intellect, admirably articulate, and with evident organizati­onal and administra­tive skills, yet possessed of humility, an open mind, and a generous and gracious character.

We also hope and pray that media commentato­rs refrain from spewing ludicrous allegation­s from unnamed sources or from inventing black propaganda which do not advance civil and rational discourse but instead promote personal gain, like Tulfo’s offensive commentary did.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines